Greg Cosell: Bryce Young is a complimentary piece

[mrcompletely11]

7 minutes ago, Super Grateful said:

well you'll get to see your boy Fields play today, the guy you wished we drafted. Let's see how they look side by side. Neither of them are as good as Howell though, amiright? 

What a stupid fuging post

[Panthero]

Devils advocate, there are a lot of starting qbs who took years to get good. Two of which were panthers at one point. Bryces deal is he doesnt have those guys measurables.

Edited 13 hours ago by Panthero

[SetfreexX]

56 minutes ago, Panthero said:

Devils advocate, there are a lot of starting qbs who took years to get good. Two of which were panthers at one point. Bryces deal is he doesnt have those guys measurables.

This, Bryce lacks NFL physical traits, and physical ability. 

Be as smart as you wanna be, if you can't consistently and accurately attack all three levels of the defense your offense will be limited. 

[LegioX]

2 hours ago, Panthero said:

Devils advocate, there are a lot of starting qbs who took years to get good. Two of which were panthers at one point. Bryces deal is he doesnt have those guys measurables.

Wanna take that chance on an extension? 

[SCO96]

Tepper tends to make bad decisions, so I think he’ll probably at minimum pick up the 5th year option just to save face.

I’d decline it if I were in charge. I’d let him play out the 4th year. If he excelled I’d consider franchising him to see if he could do it 2 years in a row. Only then would I even consider a long term deal.

If he was insulted thats fine because I’d already have a potential back up already on the roster who I had drafted early in the 2026 or 2027 draft or acquired by trade.

 

[Proudiddy]

1 minute ago, SCO96 said:

Tepper tends to make bad decisions, so I think he’ll probably at minimum pick up the 5th year option just to save face.

I’d decline it if I were in charge. I’d let him play out the 4th year. If he excelled I’d consider franchising him to see if he could do it 2 years in a row. Only then would I even consider a long term deal.

If he was insulted thats fine because I’d already have a potential back up already on the roster who I had drafted early in the 2026 or 2027 draft or acquired by trade.

 

You can tell even with his approach going into this year, he desperately wants Bryce to work, and to the detriment to our team.  Even with the last-season surge last year, he should’ve hedged his bets and brought in a legitimate QB or developmental prospect to compete with Bryce.  So yeah, I fully expect him to give the 5th year option, and probably not bring in any competition.

[electro's horse]

A lisfranc or turf toe injury would make the extension moot 

[SOJA]

On 10/17/2025 at 5:26 PM, UnluckyforSome said:

But but but Bryce needs more time, and better coaching, and a top 5 defense, and All-pro receivers, and pro bowl running backs and a HOF tight end, and the most expensive line money can buy, or he is just not going to develop his potential. See that's all the Panther's fault.

if we build that team we would be the eagles and I'd be ecstatic with that 

[SCO96]

37 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

You can tell even with his approach going into this year, he desperately wants Bryce to work, and to the detriment to our team.  Even with the last-season surge last year, he should’ve hedged his bets and brought in a legitimate QB or developmental prospect to compete with Bryce.  So yeah, I fully expect him to give the 5th year option, and probably not bring in any competition.

Not allowing Canales  to bring in a legit QB to compete for the starting job would be yet another bad Tepper decision. We have to many glaring needs on defense so I would use that first pick on defense. If a promising prospect dropped into round 2 I’d take him in a heartbeat. If he was talented he probably be ready to start in 2027, and possibly sooner if the counties to improve on both sides of the ball.

Edited 8 hours ago by SCO96

[TimeTravelerTep]

9 hours ago, SetfreexX said:

This, Bryce lacks NFL physical traits, and physical ability. 

Be as smart as you wanna be, if you can't consistently and accurately attack all three levels of the defense your offense will be limited. 

I think his football IQ is well below average. I do not think he can read defenses at all. He is not the long term answer. I'm getting worried about DC. I think he has problems seeing the big picture for each game. Some people can't accept it, but this game is greatly affected by momentum. It's hard to explain but you can just feel his decisions break it at least two or three times a game (I think he is pretty solid when it comes to 4th down decisions).

My biggest concern is this. You have seen these coaches time and time again. For some reason you have these coaches that absolutely will not go with what is working. We need a name for these coaches, what is it? If something is working great, they just do not have the intelligence to comprehend that something working is actually good for their team. They cannot understand this. AND REPORTERS NEED TO CALL THIS OUT. Rushing was insane for the past two games...ok let's take half his carries away and have Bryce air it out (look at the attempts he had). The reporters need to freaking ask "((this)) was working, you didn't do ((this)), do you consider that bad coaching? If so, why? If not, why do you defend doing the opposite of what it best?"

Anyone knows you keep doing something until they stop it. But you have these coaches that think the are going to pull a fast one on them and do the thing that is not working. Dave is starting to remind me of that guy in the movie Kung Pow. I think his name was Weeblow or something, he had those squeaky shoes when he ran around. The Kung Fu masters trained him wrong as a joke, so he did things to get the crap beat out of him instead of winning the fight. I am going to start calling Dave Canales WEEBLOW if he keeps doing the opposite of what would win. But seriously, if he is going to be that type of coach, I would honestly get rid of him after this season. You 100% do not want a coach with this flaw...they may have one good fluke season but it will be years of terrible teams.

[Dilla]

8 hours ago, Proudiddy said:

You can tell even with his approach going into this year, he desperately wants Bryce to work, and to the detriment to our team.  Even with the last-season surge last year, he should’ve hedged his bets and brought in a legitimate QB or developmental prospect to compete with Bryce.  So yeah, I fully expect him to give the 5th year option, and probably not bring in any competition.

I think they'll split the middle with competition. I'm fairly confident that Carolina drafts another QB next year. But not in the 1st round, but like a good measurables guy in the 3rd-5th rounds. That way, they bring in another young guy, but a mid round pick won't effect any 1st round decisions for 2027.

Edited 32 minutes ago by Dilla

[amcoolio]

30 minutes ago, Dilla said:

I think they'll split the middle with competition. I'm fairly confident that Carolina drafts another QB next year. But not in the 1st round, but like a good measurables guy in the 3rd-5th rounds. That way, they bring in another young guy, but a mid round pick won't effect any 1st round decisions for 2027.

I hope not. 3rd-5th round QB's are historically awful. Most of the time that team is just drafting another QB in the first the following year. Look at the Saints, if they continue to suck this year they are just taking a QB. And if they do they just threw away a 2nd round pick that they just drafted. We did the same poo with Clausen, Greer, Pike, that guy we drafted a few years ago who is so irrelevant I forgot his name... 

Just take a 1st round QB if Bryce isn't the answer and be prepared to live with it