Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Week 7: Panthers @ Jets Gameday Thread


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Pat Jones out time for the rookie Princely or Scourton to show up. 

Hopefully these rookies start getting better QB pressure. I would like to see them develop into long term answers. Or, worst cases, very productive and long term rotational guys. I'd kill for one of them to be Al Wallace or Mario Addison.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Fields is so scared and uncertain of throwing the ball he actually has zero INT's this season. However he does have three fumbles. Bryce has 8 total TO's so far this season. 

On paper that TO battle doesn't favor us at QB specifically.

On the flipside with him being hesitant to let it go, he gets sacked a ton, which is why the Jets have given up the most sacks on the season with 25. 

With our pass rush being invisible so far this may be the game they can show some life. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Pantherxtreme said:

On the flipside with him being hesitant to let it go, he gets sacked a ton, which is why the Jets have given up the most sacks on the season with 25. 

With our pass rush being invisible so far this may be the game they can show some life. 

We also have to rely on our guys setting the edge and LB's spying Fields adequately. That's a big, BIG concern.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, R0CKnR0LLA said:

Jets are such a dumpster fire, Panthers really should win this.

I am not gonna say INEXCUSABLE loss but....it would be as close to possible as their is for inexcusable. I hesitate to use that word because we are such a bad team.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I am not gonna say INEXCUSABLE loss but....it would be as close to possible as their is for inexcusable. I hesitate to use that word because we are such a bad team.

If a Jets loss isn't inexcusable what is 

Edited by dep
typo
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

I expect Coker to be targeted often on 3rd down

This is my concern

Run the damned ball with Rico until they stop it

i dont care that Chuba.  Corbett or Coker are back

the primary right now should be leave the damned dance with the same line and running back combo that brung ya

Do not over think this   Do what works until it doesn’t   

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the last time the Carolina Panthers were above .500 — even briefly — was in Week 3 of the 2018 season, when they started 2-1.

Here’s a quick breakdown:

  • 2018: Started 6-2 before collapsing to finish 7-9.

  • 2019–2024: They have never been above .500 at any point in those seasons — every year they’ve either started 0-1 or 1-1, then dropped below .500 and stayed there.

So the last time they were above .500 at any point was November 4, 2018, after beating Tampa Bay to go 6-2.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It is interesting how the games changed over the past 10-15 years. I mainly started watching football in like 2010 or so. I feel like every week there were QBs throwing for 400+, 300 yards was a pedestrian day it felt like. Now even the best qbs dont throw for 300 super often it feels.
    • I dont necessarily disagree just really curious as to why that is?  He either must be a dunce, a bad teammate or must be horrendous in practice because I thought he showed promise at least in his 2nd year
    • Its AI but here goes nothing:   Trevor Lawrence's catchable ball statistics vary by situation, with his highest rate being 74.1%74.1 % 74.1% in a clean pocket and his lowest on deep balls at 41.2%41.2 % 41.2% . When pressured, his catchable pass rate is 51.6%51.6 % 51.6% , and it's 55.2%55.2 % 55.2% on play-action plays. Lawrence has also been impacted by a high receiver drop rate, which makes it appear as if he is more inaccurate than he is.  Catchable pass rate by situation  Clean pocket: 74.1%74.1 % 74.1% (ranks 28th out of 32 quarterbacks) Deep balls: 41.2%41.2 % 41.2% (ranks 23rd out of 32 quarterbacks) When pressured: 51.6%51.6 % 51.6% (ranks 15th out of 32 quarterbacks) On play action: 55.2%55.2 % 55.2% (ranks 28th out of 32 quarterbacks) Red zone: 65.1%65.1 % 65.1% (ranks 15th out of 32 quarterbacks) When blitzed: 69.2%69.2 % 69.2% (ranks 19th out of 32 quarterbacks)    Compared to:   Bryce Young's catchable ball stats vary by situation, with a high catchable pass rate of 73.2%73.2 % 73.2% in a clean pocket (30th in the NFL) and a 60%60 % 60% rate on deep throws (20+ air yards), which was 10th in the NFL in 2024. However, his pressured and blitzed catchable rates were lower at 39.7%39.7 % 39.7% (31st) and 60.3%60.3 % 60.3% (29th), respectively.  By situation  Clean pocket: 73.2%73.2 % 73.2% catchable pass rate (30th in NFL) Deep ball (20+ air yards): 60%60 % 60% catchable pass rate (10th in NFL in 2024) Pressure: 39.7%39.7 % 39.7% catchable pass rate (31st in NFL) Blitzed: 60.3%60.3 % 60.3% catchable pass rate (29th in NFL) Red zone: 62.5%62.5 % 62.5% catchable pass rate (22nd in NFL) 
×
×
  • Create New...