Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB options for the 2026 season


CBird
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, strato said:

I am not going to argue and say people don’t do that, but bro… you talking about two games. I am talking about .. all the other ones. 

I haven't looked but im estimated guessing that Daniel Jones only flashed in NY when Barkley was balling out. And now hes doing well in Indy because JT is on pace for 30 TDs. I wasn't replying saying hes poo im just backing the brinks truck up for him in FA 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

I haven't looked but im estimated guessing that Daniel Jones only flashed in NY when Barkley was balling out. And now hes doing well in Indy because JT is on pace for 30 TDs. I wasn't replying saying hes poo im just backing the brinks truck up for him in FA 


I don’t understand your contention that Rico’s two great games or Daniel Jones and Taylor’s play have relevance to my point  

Every QB benefits from a great running back. No argument. The point was clear, teams crowd the near field vs Young same as they did with Cam after he lost his gun. Because? They don’t fear being beat deep. 
 

Edited by strato
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

I haven't looked but im estimated guessing that Daniel Jones only flashed in NY when Barkley was balling out. And now hes doing well in Indy because JT is on pace for 30 TDs. I wasn't replying saying hes poo im just backing the brinks truck up for him in FA 

Yeah, Jones got carried by Saquan and now he's being carried by Jonathan Taylor who is probably the MVP at the halfway point of the season. Bryce has basically been ass per usual except when Rico is running for 200 yards.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, csx said:

Distressed assets are quality assets that are undervalued because of current management or ownership. Mayfield seems the perfect example. Browns and Panthers were what limited him. Not him.

Jones and Mayfield were acquired cheaply because of this. 

Young doesn't fit this unless you think hes actually much better than he appears to be.

People forget how terrible Mayfield was here because it’s become popular to idolize him, since he’s found the perfect scenario for himself. But a 74.4 QB rating (worse than Bryce) a 1-1 TD-INT ratio (worse than Bryce) and a .200 win percentage (worse than Bryce somehow!) meant he was actually better than Bryce here. It’s great that people want to improve the QB room because it definitely needs it, if not an overhaul. But the whole “it wasn’t Baker’s fault” has to be from people who didn’t watch in 2022.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Joe Bear said:

People forget how terrible Mayfield was here because it’s become popular to idolize him, since he’s found the perfect scenario for himself. But a 74.4 QB rating (worse than Bryce) a 1-1 TD-INT ratio (worse than Bryce) and a .200 win percentage (worse than Bryce somehow!) meant he was actually better than Bryce here. It’s great that people want to improve the QB room because it definitely needs it, if not an overhaul. But the whole “it wasn’t Baker’s fault” has to be from people who didn’t watch in 2022.

Wasnt Baker coming off injury when first here…i dont remember 

the Rhule Fitterer years were a hot mess and the franchise is still paying 

both Darnold and Baker csn play, and could play   They rose with better organizations and coaches …neither of which the Panthers had.

 Im not sure what the Panthers have now

Edited by raleigh-panther
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Gonna be interesting to see how the Colts handle that situation 

If they're smart the same way the Vikings should've handled the Darnold situation. Franchise tag. I wouldn't want to pay Jones after one year of good play while being carried by a RB having an MVP caliber season. That would probably prove to be a mistake. The franchise tag might too but at least you're free and clear after a year if it is.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If they're smart the same way the Vikings should've handled the Darnold situation. Franchise tag. I wouldn't want to pay Jones after one year of good play while being carried by a RB having an MVP caliber season. That would probably prove to be a mistake. The franchise tag might too but at least you're free and clear after a year if it is.

Yea seems like the most obvious case of fools gold yet 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If they're smart the same way the Vikings should've handled the Darnold situation. Franchise tag. I wouldn't want to pay Jones after one year of good play while being carried by a RB having an MVP caliber season. That would probably prove to be a mistake. The franchise tag might too but at least you're free and clear after a year if it is.

Franchise tag would be insanely expensive. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...