Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kaye: Panthers not likely to be "sellers" at trade deadline


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

We don't have a lot of assets that most will want. The bulk that we so are basically no fly zones. 

I get the want to make upgrades but there are not likely to be cheap and available upgrades at a reasonable cost. It's possible but not probable.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I can't sign on to trading Hubbard while I believe he still isn't fully healthy (so can't be properly evaluated) and Dowdle is only on a one-year deal. 

Also don't trust in Brooks at all.

I see that,but my focus is broader, which changes the logic (unless I am missing something here).  If you like Rico and trade Hubbard, you don't have to let Rico go--you could sign him, have Etienne and Brooks and maybe even a late round draft pick--but you get an ILB, which is our biggest weakness--which is my point.  If you isolate your focus on RB only and you focus on next year, it makes little sense to trade Hubbard--to me, you upgrade LB right now and you have RBs.  I think we are constantly in rebuild or build mode, we don't think like those seeking rings.   What helps us more--(and I am not sure about Hubbard's trade value, which was part of your point)--a backup RB (solid but still a backup right now) or a starting ILB?  Which player fills our needs?  So I could argue your point, but there are other perspectives that should be considered if you broaden the scope.  It is not a no-brainer--lotta variables.

Edited by MHS831
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a pass rusher would be hard to get--so I have not mentioned it.  i also think that our two young OLBs are showing some signs.  It is tough to figure out.  Is it scheme?  Are we predictable?  However, I don't see us upgrading by adding a Reddick (sheer luck) by next week.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

I'd like to be a buyer of a Jets or Dolphins pass rusher even if we're not sellers 

Depends on price, IMO. Good fits but it would need to be for a relative bargain and/or with a plan to retain(mainly with Phillips).

Chubb is injury prone, 29 and has 2 years left at roughly $20 mil(real cost to us, not including prorated money). None of this money is guaranteed, however. 

Philips is 26 and on an expiring $13.5 mil deal.

Chubb would probably be easier to obtain, although potentially a cap suck if he gets injured again.

Philips would potentially be more expensive to acquire and a risk if you aren't able to immediately sign him to an extension. 

Chubb could be the bigger, cheaper gamble with an easy exit strategy.

Phillips could be a long term solution but also potentially leave you holding the bag if he REALLY doesn't want to return and skips out this offseason(minus the tag). He is also in his prime as a player.

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I think a pass rusher would be hard to get--so I have not mentioned it.  i also think that our two young OLBs are showing some signs.  It is tough to figure out.  Is it scheme?  Are we predictable?  However, I don't see us upgrading by adding a Reddick (sheer luck) by next week.  

 

I would also hate to see us dump any picks in the top 3 rounds. Those are just too valuable to trade for a team so incredibly far away from being a contender.

Even if Scourton and Umanmielen are just basically better version of Jones/Wonnum, I still want them to keep getting the bulk of the reps. Jones/Wonnum are just middle of the road rotational players. Perhaps Scourton/Umanmielen end up being better.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, strato said:

Well those guys have a shot to be much better players 12 months from now. We should just ride with what we have. 

I am not convinced there will be dramatic difference makers available, especially with such large coaching issues on both sides of the ball.

Still, hopefully Dan is doing due diligence.

Edited by kungfoodude
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

I am not convinced there will be dramatic difference makers available, especially with such large coaching issues on both sides of the ball.

Still, hopefully Dan is doing due diligence.

Bottom of the roster churn would be okay with me. If some trades are made some people will be waived/released. 
 

I was citing something in my SEC does not equal NFL arguments a couple of years back and it is the difference one year of NFL and the following offseason do for players. 
These guys are not going to be college players if they do it right, year two. 

Edited by strato
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I can't sign on to trading Hubbard while I believe he still isn't fully healthy (so can't be properly evaluated) and Dowdle is only on a one-year deal. 

Also don't trust in Brooks at all.

This 

Excited Lets Go GIF

Also, on this team right now, I think you need some kind of consistency builder. Giving Chuba a second contract and then trading him away so early in it doesn't look great in a locker room for a team trying to build an identity. 

 

Edited by Khyber53
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I can't sign on to trading Hubbard while I believe he still isn't fully healthy (so can't be properly evaluated) and Dowdle is only on a one-year deal. 

Also don't trust in Brooks at all.

I get what you're saying to an extent, but bringing in Rico on a cheap deal and his performance so far kind of shows why you might trade Chubba, or at least why you dont give rb big deals.  Its not that all uncommon to find solid rbs on the scrap heap.   The only time having a great rb longterm really helps is when you are a great team already. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I really fuging hate this era in so many ways.  I look at those Adin Ross and Neon kids, and I just wonder why tf are they famous?  Why would anyone be desperate enough to gain THAT audience that they’d risk money, career, disciplinary action to go up there and associate with those fuging dweebs?  And back in my day, racist peers got their ass beat.  And not endorsing or approving bully culture, but checks and balances and all…  had those two been bullied, or at the very least humbled, they wouldn’t be famous and glorified for being the fuging idiots they are now.  It seriously pisses me off… they both have done and said multiple, openly racist stuff and major media keeps pushing them, talking about them, and propping them up… and then dummies like Puka who don’t need the platform or exposure lend their celebrity to them.  fuging idiot… and even the other streamers, I don’t get - Speed, Kai…  I don’t understand making nobodies famous at all, but there is at least entertainment value to some degree there, and I could see how young, impressionable kids would find them something to aspire to (sadly), or view as “cool.”  But Ross and Neon?  They’re just shitty, shitty nerds with big ass mouths. I’ve went back recently and watched some classics (in two very different eras and categories 😂)  like Robocop and Idiocracy.  And what I find fascinating is how both movies illustrate how stupid society became by showing what the citizenry is entertained by.  In both, society became anti-intellectual and the citizenry were entertained by lowest denominator, primal-type absurdity - poo like, “Ouch! My Balls!”  Or on Robocop, a guy is a watching a show where they are smashing cakes on ladies’ breasts and then a guy says a line as the camera zooms in like, “I’d buy that for a dollar!” and the audience thinks it’s hilarious.  That’s where I feel like we are now.  Like who watches that clip with Puka and thinks any of that poo is funny or cool?  If I was Puka, I’d honestly be wondering why tf I’m hanging out with these beta ass, racist, cretin ass weirdos.
    • 7 wins this year and some of those against really good teams and yall think Canales might get fired? Lol Good luck getting a better coach in here if that happens.  
    • Should definitely look to trade him in the offseason. Some team will fork over draft picks thinking they can turn his career around, especially considering what happened to Mayfield and Darnold after they left here. I think a lot of people will be surprised at how high of a pick he would fetch too. There's a dozen guys you could bring in to match (or exceed) Bryce's production for 1/10th of what his 5th year option is going to cost. Let some other dumb team pay that (and ship us draft picks for the privilege). Dump Dalton too while you're at it, start the QB room over from scratch.
×
×
  • Create New...