Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The tide finally turns... Even Bryce nut huggers at PFF finally admit the obvious.


MRenshaw
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'm reminded of that old joke: On the third day of his captivity in a barn, Eagle Eye noticed that the barn was missing one wall... 

"I don't think they have the quarterback who confidently attacks beyond 20 yards down the field... Of all the teams in the NFL, if the Carolina Panthers are not running the football well, they're the team I trust the least to get away."

 

"So Young, ughhhhh, I don't think he's playing as well as last year... Sort of unspectacular hard regression... He's gone into this just, he's not moving the ball. We were defending the pedestrian stat lines last year... but he's not playing well at all this season. He's one of the worst QBs in the NFL in terms of PFF grades this season, and that's been I think real. He's not playing at a high level."

 

 

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Captroop said:

I think everyone wanted it to work for him. He's cerebral. He seems like a genuinely nice guy and a good kid. 

He's just not cut out for NFL football, and no amount of good will or rose tinted glasses can hide that anymore. 

The end of the "next Gen stats" era of evaluating QBs. We just happened to be holding the bag when that revelation came to light. Sorry, but sometimes you just need to use your fuggin' eyes. And if you're mortgaging your future, it should be on a guy who looks like a football player. 

If we failed after picking Anthony Richardson at least I’d say dude looked the part. Bryce Young was so obviously not up to the task it’s sad. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Montsta said:

If we failed after picking Anthony Richardson at least I’d say dude looked the part. Bryce Young was so obviously not up to the task it’s sad. 

I mean there was another QB that absolutely looked the part and demonstrated his abilities in his first season. We'll see how he works out long term, but we had a solid option that passed the eye test.

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Captroop said:

I think everyone wanted it to work for him. He's cerebral. He seems like a genuinely nice guy and a good kid. 

He's just not cut out for NFL football, and no amount of good will or rose tinted glasses can hide that anymore. 

The end of the "next Gen stats" era of evaluating QBs. We just happened to be holding the bag when that revelation came to light. Sorry, but sometimes you just need to use your fuggin' eyes. And if you're mortgaging your future, it should be on a guy who looks like a football player. 

That's the thing. I think if you were objectively watching him play and not desperately clinging to a narrative you kinda knew how his NFL career was gonna go based on his college play. All the lack of physical tools was evident. The stylistic issues of immediately backpedaling 10 yards behind the LOS and standing square to the field waiting on one of your future All-Pro WRs to break open while future NFLers blocked for you to then try to flip your hips and get in position to throw a wobbly wounded duck that your receiver would adjust to... none of that poo was ever gonna work in the NFL. 

Of all the highly drafted QBs in recent years he was THE one that I was just like "yeah, I don't see any chance". Most of the early reaches the guy at least has top tier physical tools even if he has a ten cent head.

  • Pie 7
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Montsta said:

If we failed after picking Anthony Richardson at least I’d say dude looked the part. Bryce Young was so obviously not up to the task it’s sad. 

It is a big time indictment on ownership. Along with the other indictments. But Bryce was the major offense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...