Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Week 11: Panthers @ Falcons Gameday Thread


kungfoodude
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, L-TownCat said:

Yeah Bryce still ain’t the answer.  Damn near died to try to be the hero.  It ain’t worth it little dude.  Go home.

This type of comment after setting the Panthers passing record against the league's #1 pass defense is so humiliating for the Panthers and the Carolinas as a fanbase

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, hepcat said:

That Canales decision to kick after winning the toss I  OT. They won but that was the wrong decision 10 out of 10 times. Worst coaching decision since that

Where is my trump wrong gif. You understand that if the falcons went down and scored a touchdown and went for 2 and got it that the Panthers would have still gotten the ball? It gives the second team the knowledge to go for it on 4th down if needed. It's 100% the correct call

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

90% of the board has the same thought process

Perhaps, but we still have elements who could see Bryce walk on water and frame it as "Bryce can't swim". 

Me? I need to see consistency. The week to week rollercoaster ride makes me wanna take part in the hundred meter cookie toss 🤢

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Perhaps, but we still have elements who could see Bryce walk on water and frame it as "Bryce can't swim". 

Me? I need to see consistency. The week to week rollercoaster ride makes me wanna take part in the hundred meter cookie toss 🤢

With 6 games left consistency has left the building.   You simply have to bring in more competition n9 matter what he does to finish.  

Edited by mrcompletely11
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Under the current OT rules, it's become a very common decision.

I like getting the ball first, but with the rules now giving both teams a possession, it's a reasonable choice.

No it’s not. The risk is the highest letting the other team get the ball first. They can still score a TD and end the game so it’s not all things equal. If they thought the other offense sucks and their defense can handle it, then it makes no difference if they start with the ball or not. You still take the ball. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

Sure but it doesn't matter to me.   The foundation has been poured.   His past 35ish games tell a story no matter what happened today but again kudos to Bryce for balling today

Making a decision off a single game performance is like drafting a player strictly off a highlight reel. 

You do have to factor today in, but full season evaluation matters more. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am trying to remember when I EVER said reach for need. My thing if someone falls you jump, if you can trade back a few slots and get help at the right value and pick up some ammo to move up from 51 which I think is outside the money zone, then you do that.   Take a WR later. Plenty of capable WRs have come from the 3rd round. Though this year I would go for C there if there was a reasonable choice. Take a TE if you must. I see more reason to take WR than TE. I think you give guys drafted two years ago and last year a chance to develop before cancelling them.    I think it is kind of unrealistic to throw everything all in on offense in hopes of going deep in the playoffs after an 8-10 year, even if it did have some nice bright spots in it.    And outside of this argument but relevant to it, I am bothered by Canales and Morgan and their apparent posture that we have arrived and are now in the big boy club. I don’t know where that comes from. They are out there talking like they are winners at 8-10. Backing into the playoffs in a real convoluted tie breaker scenario. They had some good games, yes. But the big feather n the cap, the LA Rams matchups, did you see what the Rams did? They didn’t fire the coaches but they fired their defensive backs. Bryce beat them yes, and it was pretty, but it was kind of like the Bucs and Mike Evans picking on our decimated secondary in 2022. Someone (Wilks) went down for allowing that to happen and they went down in LA too.  Wr aren’t as good as a whole lot of homers think we are. Shore up the trenches.    I think too many fans buy into it because they are so starved for anything that looks like a winner. 
    • How exactly does one win OROY "by default"? Wouldn't winning the award mean that of the two, McMillon stayed strong the entire year while the other guy didn't and fizzled out? That's like saying Secretariat only won by default because the other horse stopped moving midway through the race. Absolutely zero logic in that statement, which makes me very glad that I've never really paid much attention to Walterfoozball.
    • I agree, teams in the past have fired the HC in order to retain a coach on staff...hell it happened to Mcderp this year, rams in the past and Im missing another.  The fall off for the Panthers team defense was huge once Mcderp leftd and Ron could not fix it even when he named himself DC. 
×
×
  • Create New...