Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canales


scratched
 Share

Recommended Posts

I don't think the play calling is the issue. I don't think scheme is the issue. 

I'm not even sure what the proper term is, but I think our entire philosophy and approach to offensive football is what's killing us. We try to slow down the game so much, and limit possessions. I'm just not sure we have the personnel to do that.

A few Facts: 

1. Bryce is better when we are trailing late. 

2. Bryce has a miraculous number of game winning drives.

3. Chuba has been much less effective this season.

4. Our record is almost entirely dependent on the coin toss. 

5. Some games Bryce looks like Tom Brady throwing the deep ball, sometimes he looks like Oprah Winfrey throwing a deep ball. 

All these can be explained pretty simply with our offensive philosophy. Dave wants to slow the game down as much as humanly possible. This may be his philosophy as a coach, it may be due to his beliefs about the team, but it's clear that is his desire. It's a smart way to play football. The Eagles have won a lot of games doing this. I just don't think this team wins that way. 

Bryce seems to look like a world beater after we are trailing, or after he throws his novelty INT in the first half, but I think that's because once we abandon the philosophy of slowing the game down, Bryce is more comfortable. I don't know how many of you played sports, but baseball, football, whatever, you have to stay loose and stay warm. When we throw it short 15 times and then throw one deep ball, it's hard to be accurate. When we throw it 40 times with 7 deep balls, those 7 are very likely much more accurate than the one. It's not surprise that we have so many game winning drives, because we have so many opportunities for game winning drives. The shorter the game, in theory, the closer the game will be. In a game when both teams get 6 possessions, it's pretty reasonable to assume that it will be a close game. It's also reasonable to assume that we will have the ball with a chance to win in the 4th quarter. 

Chuba also seems to do well when we are spreading it out, and throwing it everywhere. Honestly, most running backs do.  I don't think he's built to line up with 10 in the box and run it 35 times a game. Rico is much more that back. Chuba played at OK State in a spread system, and seems to have more success when we are doing that late in games, like Bryce. 

My last point is that our record is almost totally dependent on the coin toss. To win with limited possessions, you almost always have to win the "middle 8" of the game. When you lose the opening coin toss, it's harder to do that. We don't seem to be efficient enough on offense to overcome receiving the ball in the first half. 

I think the playcalling is fine. I think the scheme is fine. It's the philosophy that doesn't seem to be working, and why I do still think Bryce could have a lot of success somewhere else. If were going to play this way, we need an athletic quarterback, or an extremely accurate one, but playing this style of football is always going to hurt a QB's accuracy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Canales needs to give up play calling

…and not to his buddy Izik

his play calling is totally predictable 

how in the name of god does Rico only have 6 touches…how 

they need a seasoned OC

expect Evero to move on as well.  

 Canales’ buddy Salah beat  Dave’s ass like a drum

On Young, the minute I saw Young’s demeanor out the tunnel, I knew his happy ass would  be tentative 

that hanging pass to the end  zone instead of running it in was egregiously poor for a 3rd year player 

wouldn’t it be great to have a qb who can actually run a QB sneak

they need to move on from Young….it is clear 

Edited by raleigh-panther
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Canales wants to look retainable for Tepper, he would go to him at this point and suggest making the final Bryce benching, and attempt to coach his way into the playoffs.  

I'm not confident Dennis Morton Canales can do it, but it would be in his interest to bench the QB and see if he can produce with what else is available.  

I can see this team just kinda of continue this roller coaster and end up 7-10, feeling directionless. 

But on the other end, we're not going to be top-4 in the draft...so might as well just try to build momentum, play high-risk ball with the young talent and see if anything pops.  

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

Canales needs to give up play calling

…and not to his buddy Izik

his play calling is totally predictable 

how in the name of god does Rico only have 6 touches…how 

they need a seasoned OC

expect Evero to move on as well.  

 Canales’ buddy Salah beat  Dave’s ass like a drum

On Young, the minute I saw Young’s demeanor out the tunnel, I knew his happy ass would  be tentative 

that hanging pass to the end  zone instead of running it in was egregiously poor for a 3rd year player 

wouldn’t it be great to have a qb who can actually run a QB sneak

they need to move on from Young….it is clear 

A fuging SNEAK??? That MFer could have waltzed right in the end zone on the roll out. He's just a fuging idiot.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every Canales thread turns into a Bryce bashing thread. It’s the same tired excuses every thread. 
 

I get it, Bryce is absolute ass and this team will go nowhere with him. I agree with that. But show me the open receivers that Bryce is missing. Give me one good reason we should have 9 rushing attempts. Show me where this offensive scheme is working, but Bryce isn’t executing. 
 

And before you simpletons accuse me of being a Bryce apologist. Bryce is not an NFL quarterback. This should be his last year here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Johnstonny said:

I'm OK with Canales for now and would like to see him with a QB that can run his offense. I'm not always enamored with his play calling but I think his choices are definitely limited with the half pint pinto under center. Its truly amazing he won any games with this qb.

Not running the ball when you have two good backs and letting little shitbird throw it around is insanity.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ImfromClayton said:

I don't think Canales is on the hot seat at all. We've seen substantial improvement in his time here. 

That said, the issues on offense are either Bryce or Canales, or both, and at some point, Tepp is going to have to pick a scape goat. 

I have a hard time understanding how Bryce could be suffering from a coaching problem. He suffered from a lack of talent problem. Lack of tools. Lack of vision. Lack of proper mechanics which rob him of what little velocity he can muster when not applied. 
I think he would roll out whether it was called or not. He has been bailing early since he got here. 

A new coach isn’t gonna do anything with him. IMO. In fact good luck finding one that wants to take a job where he has Bryce as his QB. That’s how we got Canales I think. It wasn’t just Tepper people avoided,


I was one who defended Canales but if it takes him being gone to get Bryce gone, just do it. Whatever it takes to clean my palette of this foul rancid meal we are forced to consume each week. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sir Big Spurr said:

Every Canales thread turns into a Bryce bashing thread. It’s the same tired excuses every thread. 
 

I get it, Bryce is absolute ass and this team will go nowhere with him. I agree with that. But show me the open receivers that Bryce is missing. Give me one good reason we should have 9 rushing attempts. Show me where this offensive scheme is working, but Bryce isn’t executing. 
 

And before you simpletons accuse me of being a Bryce apologist. Bryce is not an NFL quarterback. This should be his last year here. 

Open receivers that go untargeted get pointed out every week. 
 

I have no answer that excuses the lack of running calls. fug you and your simpletons bullshit. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Then Dan Morgan should be on the hot seat. Wasting a first and second rounder in a pivotal year is unforgivable.
    • They addressed D in free agency in a big way (Edge, ILB) and they signed a starting OT and a player they think could be a swing OT in reserve.  They have claimed to be adding "Weapons" to the offense.  I think that will be their focus.  I agree 100% that we need a T, but a reserve, developmental OT in a weak (at the top) draft does little to address that weakness in 2026.  If they are telling the truth, a reserve developmental OT is not a weapon.  The will draft a WR if that statement and their actions in free agency are accurate.  That does not mean we ignore OT--I just dont see where he takes a T if he is filling holes. As a coach, I am concerned about OT, but when I look at the roster, I see bigger immediate problems. S: We are OK if you want Scott for another season. Not ideal.  There is also talk of Smith-Wade being moved to S.  If so, we need a CBN. DT: Who took Robinson's job?  He played a lot.  All DTs (NT-DE) were average to below average, (except Derrick Brown) including 280 lb wharton.  We need a DT (my preference for the first pick, to be honest)  I am guessing a DT will be our third rounder? ILB:  Unless we want Wallace out there in coverage, we need a compliment to Lloyd.  I think Lloyd's starting mate is the second rounder. (speculating)  This pick is likely to occur in the second round because it is for a starting position. WR:  Some are fine with what we have.  sIn 2025, Coker had 3  TDs on 394 yards.  Legette had 3 TDs and 363 yards--and only 1 drop.  I love Coker, but neither should make us feel secure about WR with those numbers.  A lot depends on both stepping up in 2026, but Canales has been screaming weapons.  Could he mean Tight end?  That depends on how good they feel about Coker and XL. Center:  You can get a player ready to start relatively early in the middle rounds.  Very similar to the OT situation but I think C may be more of a priority right now than OT.   Tight End:  They seem to like Delp from Georgia who projects round 4. CB:  There was some talk of moving Smith-Wade to S (to learn for a season with Scott, maybe?) and that might require adding CB depth inside. Tackle?:  I agree that we need one, but this draft is simply not strong at the top at T.  The ONLY way to get a quality OT that is still developmental is to take one in round 1.  Canales has all but said we are not doing that.  But after the first 40 picks or so, they pretty much level out for a good while.  The fifth rounders and the third rounders are about the same.  For that Reason, I am guessing (It is all guesses) that they take someone like the OT from Boston College or Memphis.  Work with the OL coach (OT specialist) for a season.  I dunno
×
×
  • Create New...