Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canales


scratched
 Share

Recommended Posts

I don't think the play calling is the issue. I don't think scheme is the issue. 

I'm not even sure what the proper term is, but I think our entire philosophy and approach to offensive football is what's killing us. We try to slow down the game so much, and limit possessions. I'm just not sure we have the personnel to do that.

A few Facts: 

1. Bryce is better when we are trailing late. 

2. Bryce has a miraculous number of game winning drives.

3. Chuba has been much less effective this season.

4. Our record is almost entirely dependent on the coin toss. 

5. Some games Bryce looks like Tom Brady throwing the deep ball, sometimes he looks like Oprah Winfrey throwing a deep ball. 

All these can be explained pretty simply with our offensive philosophy. Dave wants to slow the game down as much as humanly possible. This may be his philosophy as a coach, it may be due to his beliefs about the team, but it's clear that is his desire. It's a smart way to play football. The Eagles have won a lot of games doing this. I just don't think this team wins that way. 

Bryce seems to look like a world beater after we are trailing, or after he throws his novelty INT in the first half, but I think that's because once we abandon the philosophy of slowing the game down, Bryce is more comfortable. I don't know how many of you played sports, but baseball, football, whatever, you have to stay loose and stay warm. When we throw it short 15 times and then throw one deep ball, it's hard to be accurate. When we throw it 40 times with 7 deep balls, those 7 are very likely much more accurate than the one. It's not surprise that we have so many game winning drives, because we have so many opportunities for game winning drives. The shorter the game, in theory, the closer the game will be. In a game when both teams get 6 possessions, it's pretty reasonable to assume that it will be a close game. It's also reasonable to assume that we will have the ball with a chance to win in the 4th quarter. 

Chuba also seems to do well when we are spreading it out, and throwing it everywhere. Honestly, most running backs do.  I don't think he's built to line up with 10 in the box and run it 35 times a game. Rico is much more that back. Chuba played at OK State in a spread system, and seems to have more success when we are doing that late in games, like Bryce. 

My last point is that our record is almost totally dependent on the coin toss. To win with limited possessions, you almost always have to win the "middle 8" of the game. When you lose the opening coin toss, it's harder to do that. We don't seem to be efficient enough on offense to overcome receiving the ball in the first half. 

I think the playcalling is fine. I think the scheme is fine. It's the philosophy that doesn't seem to be working, and why I do still think Bryce could have a lot of success somewhere else. If were going to play this way, we need an athletic quarterback, or an extremely accurate one, but playing this style of football is always going to hurt a QB's accuracy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Canales needs to give up play calling

…and not to his buddy Izik

his play calling is totally predictable 

how in the name of god does Rico only have 6 touches…how 

they need a seasoned OC

expect Evero to move on as well.  

 Canales’ buddy Salah beat  Dave’s ass like a drum

On Young, the minute I saw Young’s demeanor out the tunnel, I knew his happy ass would  be tentative 

that hanging pass to the end  zone instead of running it in was egregiously poor for a 3rd year player 

wouldn’t it be great to have a qb who can actually run a QB sneak

they need to move on from Young….it is clear 

Edited by raleigh-panther
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Canales wants to look retainable for Tepper, he would go to him at this point and suggest making the final Bryce benching, and attempt to coach his way into the playoffs.  

I'm not confident Dennis Morton Canales can do it, but it would be in his interest to bench the QB and see if he can produce with what else is available.  

I can see this team just kinda of continue this roller coaster and end up 7-10, feeling directionless. 

But on the other end, we're not going to be top-4 in the draft...so might as well just try to build momentum, play high-risk ball with the young talent and see if anything pops.  

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

Canales needs to give up play calling

…and not to his buddy Izik

his play calling is totally predictable 

how in the name of god does Rico only have 6 touches…how 

they need a seasoned OC

expect Evero to move on as well.  

 Canales’ buddy Salah beat  Dave’s ass like a drum

On Young, the minute I saw Young’s demeanor out the tunnel, I knew his happy ass would  be tentative 

that hanging pass to the end  zone instead of running it in was egregiously poor for a 3rd year player 

wouldn’t it be great to have a qb who can actually run a QB sneak

they need to move on from Young….it is clear 

A fuging SNEAK??? That MFer could have waltzed right in the end zone on the roll out. He's just a fuging idiot.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every Canales thread turns into a Bryce bashing thread. It’s the same tired excuses every thread. 
 

I get it, Bryce is absolute ass and this team will go nowhere with him. I agree with that. But show me the open receivers that Bryce is missing. Give me one good reason we should have 9 rushing attempts. Show me where this offensive scheme is working, but Bryce isn’t executing. 
 

And before you simpletons accuse me of being a Bryce apologist. Bryce is not an NFL quarterback. This should be his last year here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Johnstonny said:

I'm OK with Canales for now and would like to see him with a QB that can run his offense. I'm not always enamored with his play calling but I think his choices are definitely limited with the half pint pinto under center. Its truly amazing he won any games with this qb.

Not running the ball when you have two good backs and letting little shitbird throw it around is insanity.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ImfromClayton said:

I don't think Canales is on the hot seat at all. We've seen substantial improvement in his time here. 

That said, the issues on offense are either Bryce or Canales, or both, and at some point, Tepp is going to have to pick a scape goat. 

I have a hard time understanding how Bryce could be suffering from a coaching problem. He suffered from a lack of talent problem. Lack of tools. Lack of vision. Lack of proper mechanics which rob him of what little velocity he can muster when not applied. 
I think he would roll out whether it was called or not. He has been bailing early since he got here. 

A new coach isn’t gonna do anything with him. IMO. In fact good luck finding one that wants to take a job where he has Bryce as his QB. That’s how we got Canales I think. It wasn’t just Tepper people avoided,


I was one who defended Canales but if it takes him being gone to get Bryce gone, just do it. Whatever it takes to clean my palette of this foul rancid meal we are forced to consume each week. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sir Big Spurr said:

Every Canales thread turns into a Bryce bashing thread. It’s the same tired excuses every thread. 
 

I get it, Bryce is absolute ass and this team will go nowhere with him. I agree with that. But show me the open receivers that Bryce is missing. Give me one good reason we should have 9 rushing attempts. Show me where this offensive scheme is working, but Bryce isn’t executing. 
 

And before you simpletons accuse me of being a Bryce apologist. Bryce is not an NFL quarterback. This should be his last year here. 

Open receivers that go untargeted get pointed out every week. 
 

I have no answer that excuses the lack of running calls. fug you and your simpletons bullshit. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The only WR that makes sense in the first is KC Concepcion. He fills multiple roles in the offense and is a PR specialist.
    • That depends upon what happens with receiver this year and what happens with free agency next year. Hopefully we'll be good by addressing receiver this year (regardless of whether we snag one in the first round or not). If we don't and are unlucky enough for to Coker get hurt (and X solidifies his bust status, and JAGs be JAGing), then we may be fùçked! But I assume that Dan Morgan and company will feel compelled to look for answers in free agency and use that to set up the draft just like this offseason.  Reality is not as simple as we drafted this position X times in a row in the first. If you're suggesting that we could draft a position in the first four times in a row, that's not likely. At some point probability has to be taken into account. I mean, how many years in a row can you be unlucky with one position?  As I've said at times before, you try and plan for the long term personnel-wise and cap-wise of course, but things happen so, in a sense, you still must look at each season--each "team" if you will--unto itself each season. So many things can happen between now and then. A major industry can profoundly impact the bigger picture (like this year), someone could offer you a trade proposal that you can't resist, players might not have progressed to your expectations--you know, things like that. Moreover, you have to be aware of the dynamics of each draft class, including the fact that there could be unexpected draft risers and fallers during the college season. That's a lot. As of today, we expect the 2027 draft to have more exclamations than question marks at OT and the QB class and WR group is expected to be exceptionally strong. We'll have a clearer picture of whatever we'll have to focus on next year at this time.  Lastly, keep in mind that there's always more than one way to get you to where you want to go. The yearly puzzle is not static, it's dynamic and complex.   
    • I'm fine with Thieneman or McNeil-Warren.. Rodriguez won't last until 51 so they would have to trade up, he may end up being a late first round selection. Anthony Hill Jr. is more likely to be available. I don't expect defense in the first round now after the murmurings of finding another weapon for Bryce.
×
×
  • Create New...