Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ESPN guys talk Bryce fifth year option


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Castavar said:

I mean, ups and downs are to be expected for a 23 year old first year starter. But he showed huge potential all season and has a huge arm. All I'm saying is all these castoffs and terrible 2nd year QBs continue to get chance after chance, while Sam Howell has proven he can throw in this league and doesn't even get an opportunity to start on another team after a decent year as a first year starter. 

You are right about him having a huge arm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I am assuming this is true.  And its kindof crazy that there hasnt really been a story about why Howell cannot stay on a roster.

2023

Sam Howell had to throw upwards of 50 times a game and 84% of his balls were catchable. Of his 612 attempts, 84% were catchable. (According to sports info solutions) EIGHTY FOUR PERCENT. That’s with the defense knowing he was going to pass. No run game. No defense having to respect play action. An atrocious offensive line. 84%. He was sacked 65 times.

There has to be more to the story. Something just doesn't add up here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Its AI but here goes nothing:

 

Trevor Lawrence's catchable ball statistics vary by situation, with his highest rate being
74.1%74.1 %
74.1%

in a clean pocket and his lowest on deep balls at

41.2%41.2 %
41.2%

. When pressured, his catchable pass rate is

51.6%51.6 %
51.6%

, and it's

55.2%55.2 %
55.2%

on play-action plays. Lawrence has also been impacted by a high receiver drop rate, which makes it appear as if he is more inaccurate than he is. 

 
 
 
Catchable pass rate by situation 
  • Clean pocket:
    74.1%74.1 %
    74.1%
    (ranks 28th out of 32 quarterbacks)
  • Deep balls:
    41.2%41.2 %
    41.2%
    (ranks 23rd out of 32 quarterbacks)
  • When pressured:
    51.6%51.6 %
    51.6%
    (ranks 15th out of 32 quarterbacks)
  • On play action:
    55.2%55.2 %
    55.2%
    (ranks 28th out of 32 quarterbacks)
  • Red zone:
    65.1%65.1 %
    65.1%
    (ranks 15th out of 32 quarterbacks)
  • When blitzed:
    69.2%69.2 %
    69.2%
    (ranks 19th out of 32 quarterbacks) 

 

Compared to:

 

Bryce Young's catchable ball stats vary by situation, with a high catchable pass rate of
73.2%73.2 %
73.2%

in a clean pocket (30th in the NFL) and a

60%60 %
60%

rate on deep throws (20+ air yards), which was 10th in the NFL in 2024. However, his pressured and blitzed catchable rates were lower at

39.7%39.7 %
39.7%

(31st) and

60.3%60.3 %
60.3%

(29th), respectively. 

 
 
By situation 
  • Clean pocket:
    73.2%73.2 %
    73.2%
    catchable pass rate (30th in NFL)
  • Deep ball (20+ air yards):
    60%60 %
    60%
    catchable pass rate (10th in NFL in 2024)
  • Pressure:
    39.7%39.7 %
    39.7%
    catchable pass rate (31st in NFL)
  • Blitzed:
    60.3%60.3 %
    60.3%
    catchable pass rate (29th in NFL)
  • Red zone:
    62.5%62.5 %
    62.5%
    catchable pass rate (22nd in NFL) 

If you want use arcane analytics 

25 in accuracy #27 in EPA/att (-0.03) #29 in completion rate (65%) #30 in TD to INT ratio (1.4) #34 in TD rate (3%)

Those are Trevor numbers

 

Again you will find anything to criticize Bryce and make those same excuses for Trevor. If you actually watch him play you would know the jags have won in spite of him basically every game. It laughable you think Bryce is in a better situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, cranky said:

You are right about him having a huge arm.

3 back to back 300+ yd games with a 8-2 td-int isn't "potential" to you as a first year starter? If Bryce Young did that, he would be getting non stopped praised and handed an extension. 

Howell showed more in his first year starting than Bryce has whole whole career. 

Edited by Castavar
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

There has to be more to the story. Something just doesn't add up here.

I think just the fact that he is not with ANY team this year says a lot. I mean there are some desperate teams out there and no one has brought him in. So yeah, I think you are right about there being something more to the story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

If you want use arcane analytics 

25 in accuracy #27 in EPA/att (-0.03) #29 in completion rate (65%) #30 in TD to INT ratio (1.4) #34 in TD rate (3%)

Those are Trevor numbers

 

Again you will find anything to criticize Bryce and make those same excuses for Trevor. If you actually watch him play you would know the jags have won in spite of him basically every game. It laughable you think Bryce is in a better situation.

For fug sake man, can you read?  Where did I criticize bryce and where did I make excuses for TL?  goddamn 

 

and bryce is in a way better situation.  Better oline, better rbs, better wrs.  What in the holy fug are you watching?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This board must have way more Clemson fans than I give it credit for, the amount of folks that watch all the Trevor Lawrence games is way higher than I would have guessed. 

#All In! Go Tigers! 

Jaguars are also 6-1 this season with Trevor's best weapon the field.  Which all of us Trevor watchers know isn't BTJ given we watch all his games. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, cranky said:

Where are you getting your numbers?

According to pro-football-reference, Youngs bad throws number is 17.5%. Caleb Williams for comparison is at 22.5% and Stroud is at 16.3%. So pretty much the same as Stroud and considerably better than Williams. 

As far as Lawrence goes, yes he is better at 15.6% but last year he was at 17.5% and the year before that he was at 18.8%.  The same or worse than the "top in bad throws" Bryce.

Given all of that, how can you claim Bryce is at the top and Trevor is below average. 

And I must say I find it ironic that I can comment on Bryces' lack of receiver talent in 24 and 23 and you say I am just using that as an excuse, yet you excuse Trevors' play with "The Jags skill positions players have been a big let down this year."

So which is it - does the talent surrounding a QB matter or not?

If you are using PFR then you should be able to easily the the dividing league average line.....where Bryce is above and Trevor is below it.  It's a big blank space that says league average when you are sorting by bad throw %. 

You don't really want to go backwards.

Bryce was #1 in bad throw % in 2023

Bryce was #1 in bad throw % in 2024 (technically 2 but #1 was Anthony Richardson and he didn't finish out the season)

in 2023, 2024, 2025.....Bryce is above league average all 3 seasons in bad throw % and Trevor is below all 3 seasons.  

Bryce stans need to find something else than thinking Trevor Lawrence somehow makes Bryce Young not bad.   It's not working.  And no one, even Clemson fans, really want to be in here defending the forever disappointing Trevor Lawrence.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Washington under Snyder had nothing but bad situations.

It's how we ended up with Brian Burns and not Greg Little in the 1st. Dan Snyder overruled his entire staff and took Dwayne Haskins RIP. If Burns had been the selection like many expected, Hurney had already said he was taking Little at 16. That would have brought his 1st round success rate down a few pegs. Woof! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, cranky said:

I think just the fact that he is not with ANY team this year says a lot. I mean there are some desperate teams out there and no one has brought him in. So yeah, I think you are right about there being something more to the story.

He's with the Eagles. They traded three lower round picks for him back in August.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...