Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Malik Willis anyone


cranky
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, carolinanimal said:

just looking at some of his throws he made, i know for certian he could not be a backup here. the contrast would be to stark 🤣

Thats why we wont bring him (or any worthwhile QB) in to "compete". Its not about winning for this franchise, its about Morgan/Tepper justifying their terrible trade. Egos over winning.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Depends on the injury. The Dolphins let that mindset cost them Drew Brees.

Not like we'd be looking at giving him big money anyway. I just want someone who can come in and give us options if (when) Bryce starts looking like typical Bryce again next year. Malik Willis, Sam Howell, Marcus Mariota. Gimme somebody along those lines. Not washed up Dalton. If we have one of those other three guys I think we have probably already washed our hands of Bryce because I doubt he gets back on the field after he missed a game earlier this year. He wasn't playing well and Canales had already benched him last year. If we had a capable #2 I think that would've been curtains.

Wasn’t it rotator cuff on his throwing side? I didn’t see the answer but an article said Dr James Andrews put 12 anchors in Brees’ shoulder when he rebuilt it, the most ever. At least at the time. 
It was a pretty major thing. He was just really lucky and so were the Saints. More so than Miami being dumb, IMO. He just beat the odds. To death. 
They say his shoulder is so bad he can’t even throw a ball in the backyard. 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So Willis had a good game against a poor defense and all of a sudden he is worth 50 million and is guaranteed to be better than Young. LOL I know he looked good in the 3 games he started, and I think he will have success long term, but anyone signing him up for a long term contract for 50 million is taking a huge risk. 
    • Is he really though? Rivera was past his prime and probably shouldn't have even started 2019 so his firing wasn't really unexpected or unwarranted. Rhule lasted two and a half years which was about one year too long in my opinion. Bringing him back that third year certainly wasn't impulsive and I would say Tepper was more patient than he should have been. Wilks finished out that third season and did pretty good but most everyone could see he really wasn't anything more than an intern HC. Bringing him back was not the long term answer so not bringing him back was the correct call. Hiring Reich was a mistake from the beginning and he recognized that fairly quickly. I am sure he knew he was going to catch a lot of sh*t for firing him so quickly ( and boy did he ) but it was absolutely the right thing to do given everything that was going on. The firing may have looked impulsive, but I think it was him recognizing he had royally f*ck up and just dealt with it instead of letting it fester.  That brings us to Canales. 2025 was only his second season and yet he delivered 8 wins and the NFC South title. And while that might not sound great, given the lack of talent and cap space they started with, it's a strong step in the right direction. I couldn't imagine Tepper not being pleased with their progress given the crap the Panthers' have been though under his ownership.
×
×
  • Create New...