Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2026 free agent left tackles


Recommended Posts

33 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

Just re-sign Yosh Nijman and see how the draft plays out.

Yeah I think you go with Nijman and Christensen and see how the draft plays out. That way you aren’t handcuffed. If you draft a guy, you have Nijman with him and Christensen can go back to back up Guard. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Johnstonny said:

With all the needs on the D I wouldn't do that. We can get someone serviceable but we nee playmakers with pick 1.

Perfect world yes, but this draft class isnt stellar. Top LBs will be gone I am sure and same can be said for edge rushers. I think OT, WR or TE will be in play at 19 if we are to go BPA 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Admiral Ackbar said:

Perfect world yes, but this draft class isnt stellar. Top LBs will be gone I am sure and same can be said for edge rushers. I think OT, WR or TE will be in play at 19 if we are to go BPA 

I think Saddiq or Styles will be available at 19 and if either are there you take them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If an OT falls to us in the draft that could start Week 1, then you take him without question.  Gives us a LT for the season since Ickey is likely to miss all of it (even if he can come back late in the season, it's hard to just step in and play well in that situation, so might as well just take the lost season) and then gives us options in 2027 when Moton might be done.

I'd rather use the 1st on a defensive player, but if we can lock down a starting OL on a rookie deal for the next 4 years, you have to take it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Admiral Ackbar said:

I think grabbing a OT at 19 is more and more the move at this point

I think Our brain trust will first determine our biggest areas they see in need. (Which are many as we know)  I would expect them to draft best player available with first round pick, then go from there. There may be some players of interest after June 1st roster cuts that are available because of salary capped teams. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Admiral Ackbar said:

I think grabbing a OT at 19 is more and more the move at this point

So apparently our plan is to never draft anyone with talent on defense and just rock a bunch of JAGs out there...

We have signed enough free agents and drafted enough talent on offense for Bryce. We can't keep hoping that random bargain bin free agents and random guys we sign off other teams practice squads turn us into a good defense...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we went LB at 19, the LB at 51 better be head and shoulders the BPA on our board. I was thinking more like 1st or 2nd and then double dipping in the mid-rounda But yeah, if we went LB back to back jn the 1st and 2nd and they turned out like Star and Short I don't think anyone would be complaining. Well, not many anyway. There's always gonna be a few no matter what. LOL 
    • I have been doing a bunch of mock drafts and this one interesting scenario popped up that made me question myself. I know our needs edge, mike, OT,wr, and secondary. This situation Love fell to 19 and I know we don't NEED a RB. But if we stay out at 19(I don't think we do) I don't think I could say no to love. If this team really believes in BPA and love is there at 19 who realistic is better than love at this point? Love is a top 5 talent, there is no akeem messador or Caleb banks or Kenyon Sadiq type player I think I would rather have than love. He would make Bryce life much easier, he's a homerun threat on a offense that lacks speed. He's essentially modern day Reggie bush to me and I think he could play alongside Chubba on passing down potentially as a slot and be the speed threat we really need. I think it's a bit crazy but I would be willing to wait til the second round and see who falls at edge(I think we land Chubb or loyd in free agency) maybe chase TJ parker if he falls or Rodriguez or golliday in the second/third. What say you?
    • They have also beaten the Rockets, Lakers, Spurs, and Nuggets... 
×
×
  • Create New...