Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dan Morgan: Panthers will pickup BY’s 5th year.


Tbe
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, NAS said:

We know what Jameis, Howell and Minshew are - not a long term option at all.

Davis Mills is interesting but such a small sample size.  Even Kyle Allen had a nice run of games once upon a time.  There's no proven commodity for starting level QB you can build around.  Malik Willis is the only one I would try to bring in for legitimate competition but he'll probably want to be a guaranteed starter somewhere else this offseason.

I just listed 4 QBs that are better than Young that are making less, combined, than his 5th year option.

This year we have the chance to go out and sign Howell, Lance, Minshew and Willis. We of course won't because we don't want to hurt Bryce's feelings.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Daddy_Uncle said:

"Still an option" gives me hope that that is just GM speak. Doesn't make me confident that they will

It is.  Dan and Brandt have shown that they are prudent.   He's not just going to say "No, we don't discuss a deal".  Agents and players wouldn't like that. 

There is no reason to rush a contract.   See how next year plays out and then make your decision.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's been several reports that this would happen for quite a while now. Oddly high amount of people acting surprised about it on social media.

If anything this shows that they aren't confident enough to give him a big contract yet and they want him to  put togethet a consistently good or great season 

You don't give a qb that struggles to get above 200 yards and 1 TD most of his games a big ass contract. 

You only give a huge contact quickly to QBs that you know are that dude. Burrow got his after 2.5 seasons of play essentially,  Mahomes got his after only 2 seasons starting. Bryce is nowhere near their level.

Edited by Hoenheim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 5th year option is guaranteed for injury only, so unless he gets hurt he can still be released/traded with no cap implications. Not really that much risk there. But barring a true breakout year next year, if Bryce is starting for us in his 5th year I will be extremely disappointed with this team. His limitations are just way too significant to overcome in the NFL.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

I just listed 4 QBs that are better than Young that are making less, combined, than his 5th year option.

This year we have the chance to go out and sign Howell, Lance, Minshew and Willis. We of course won't because we don't want to hurt Bryce's feelings.

They haven't accepted that he is a backup QB yet.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

This year we have the chance to go out and sign Howell, Lance, Minshew and Willis. We of course won't because we don't want to hurt Bryce's feelings.

Surely we will. I don't think Willis will be on that list though. I think he's going to be looking for an opportunity to definitely compete for a starting job. Signing here, I don't think you're competing for a starting job through camp and preseason. I think you're relying on Bryce faltering again which is very possible but I think Willis is going to be looking for an opportunity to legitimately compete in camp and I don't think that's happening here. Howell, Lance, Minshew, I'll also add Mariota... I think those types of guys are legit options.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OldhamA said:

I just listed 4 QBs that are better than Young that are making less, combined, than his 5th year option.

This year we have the chance to go out and sign Howell, Lance, Minshew and Willis. We of course won't because we don't want to hurt Bryce's feelings.

This is a partially bad take.  Willis is the only guy mentioned here that can reasonably be expected to perform at a level higher than Bryce.  Winston and Minshew is washed, and Howell was not good in Washington as a starter and didn’t field a single snap this past year. I swear the only reason people are obsessed over him is that he went to UNC. 

You’re not going to have better success, or even potential for success with those guys as your QB as you would with Bryce. Now, if you want to argue this thing from a production per dollars perspective, that it’d be better to roll with one of them instead because we could allocate the savings elsewhere on the roster, that’d be a better argument IMO. I’d disagree with it; relying on a QB making less they $5MM/year that isn’t on a rookie contract is not a winning strategy.  But I could see the argument that it’s possibly a viable alternative to Bryce on a $25MM/year contract. 
 

But no, none of those QBs are better than Bryce. 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, t96 said:

The 5th year option is guaranteed for injury only, so unless he gets hurt he can still be released/traded with no cap implications. Not really that much risk there. But barring a true breakout year next year, if Bryce is starting for us in his 5th year I will be extremely disappointed with this team. His limitations are just way too significant to overcome in the NFL.

Well the argument will be if we keep winning enough games you won't ever draft high enough to replace him. Unless you trade up again or get lucky and a Lamar like player drops to you in the teens or 20s

I doubt they'll have incentive to replace him unless the team noticeably dips in W-L record next year. 

Edited by Hoenheim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NAS said:

Well it depends on the price, if he's willing to get paid like the 20th best QB, I'm fine with a long term contract lol.  But if he wants top 10 or 15 money, nope. 

Top 20 is 30m a year now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, woahfraze said:

This is a partially bad take.  Willis is the only guy mentioned here that can reasonably be expected to perform at a level higher than Bryce.  Winston and Minshew is washed, and Howell was not good in Washington as a starter and didn’t field a single snap this past year. I swear the only reason people are obsessed over him is that he went to UNC. 

You’re not going to have better success, or even potential for success with those guys as your QB as you would with Bryce. Now, if you want to argue this thing from a production per dollars perspective, that it’d be better to roll with one of them instead because we could allocate the savings elsewhere on the roster, that’d be a better argument IMO. I’d disagree with it; relying on a QB making less they $5MM/year that isn’t on a rookie contract is not a winning strategy.  But I could see the argument that it’s possibly a viable alternative to Bryce on a $25MM/year contract. 
 

But no, none of those QBs are better than Bryce. 

I don't think we should spent $27m on a replacement level player.

I'm a Miami Hurricanes fan, so I have zero affinity for Howell, he's just objectively a better QB than Young.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

I just listed 4 QBs that are better than Young that are making less, combined, than his 5th year option.

This year we have the chance to go out and sign Howell, Lance, Minshew and Willis. We of course won't because we don't want to hurt Bryce's feelings.

None of them are better other than Willis who I brought up

Edited by NAS
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Surely we will. I don't think Willis will be on that list though. I think he's going to be looking for an opportunity to definitely compete for a starting job. Signing here, I don't think you're competing for a starting job through camp and preseason. I think you're relying on Bryce faltering again which is very possible but I think Willis is going to be looking for an opportunity to legitimately compete in camp and I don't think that's happening here. Howell, Lance, Minshew, I'll also add Mariota... I think those types of guys are legit options.

I don't think any of those guys are accepting a contract to backup Bryce Young. It's insulting. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...