Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Wild Card QB Performance Rankings


thebdawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, thebdawg said:

Excited to see how some of y’all spin this one
 

Also interesting that Bryce’s QB rating was lower than Rodger’s, but total QBR almost 6x higher


IMG_5620.thumb.jpeg.d63049640a90504f9ffbd5429df8aa67.jpeg

look over at QB Rating....His is the lowest.....not that hard to spin...

  • Pie 8
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, thebdawg said:

Excited to see how some of y’all spin this one
 

Also interesting that Bryce’s QB rating was lower than Rodger’s, but total QBR almost 6x higher


IMG_5620.thumb.jpeg.d63049640a90504f9ffbd5429df8aa67.jpeg

How am I supposed to be spinning this exactly?  I'm not going to compare him to the undead corpse of Aaron Rodgers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mav1234 said:

How am I supposed to be spinning this exactly?  I'm not going to compare him to the undead corpse of Aaron Rodgers.

Which one of these QBs would you not immediately trade Bryce for if given the chance? how about that spin? Not including Rodgers of course.

Edited by PootieNunu
  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean, QBR is the one that is less subjective (basically the one that really matters). 

Total QBR is adjusted and based upon who you're playing.

Bryce did well, relative to who we were playing (and relative to what he normally does), but don't mistake it for a season's work.

Edited by TD alt
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

so what i am seeing is he played alot better than stafford.....hmmmm...my eyes lied to me glad this fixed it and he actually was the third best playoff qb this weekend just sad everyone else on the team sucks and holds back his greatness ahahahahha

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TD alt said:

I mean, QBR is the one that is less subjective (basically the one that really matters). 

Total QBR is adjusted and based upon who you're playing.

Bryce did well, relative to who we were playing (and relative to what he normally does), but don't mistake it for a season's work.

So easier to fabricate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, electro's horse said:

QBR is a proprietary statistic and ESPN won’t even fully reveal how they calculate it.

not sure how you get “less subjective” out of that. 

That's easy. Because I'm comparing it to "Total QBR." All of this is within the context of the chart. If you don't like QBR, then you're probably going to hate Total QBR worse.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...