Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Round 1: The Carolina Panthers select OT Monroe Freeling (Georgia)


rodeo
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, TylerDurden said:

I’m not gonna poo 💩 the pick…  as always, I’m gonna hope for the best.  But, I just don’t get it.  The value may be incredible down the road, but right now, it isn’t.  The first round pick should always have “start as a rookie” projection, unless you’re a perineal contender, and usually even then…  this pick?  I just don’t see how it fits.  Someone else posted that Morgan said Freeling was the best on their board at our pick and it wasn’t close.  I did see that he said we were in the position to take BPA after FA.  So from that angle, I get it.  But to take a guy who probably won’t play out of injury or situational subs versus guys like Lemon or Thieneman, who would’ve stepped in immediately and started?  That one is a head scratcher for me right now.  But, in a year or two, this may look like a genius pick.

That’s why you draft. Your just more likely to get a better OT early and more likely a safety/DB later that can play.

but I get it could go either way. That’s the point I think you just go who you think can make more difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only 9 pages? 

I just stopped working. I heard the pick announced. A little surprised given the pre draft predictions,  but I think selecting Monroe Freeling is a pretty safe, smart pick given the situations with Ickey and Moton.

Now we have several options at both tackle spots and we can afford to be flexible and not have to overpay anyone at LT or RT. It's a smart business move imo.

Not sure how good this guy is. I'll have to do some research. All I remember from the pre draft analysis was he's a developmental LT with a lot of potential .

Edited by Hoenheim
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, flagfootballcoach28 said:

He ran great and jumped high, but he struggled with the drills. I literally thought to myself “I hope we don’t take this player”  during the combine. I just don’t understand why Carolina feels the need to draft these raw, boom or bust players in the 1st round with very little college production? I thought Dan Morgan learned his lesson last draft when he took the highly productive WR in TMac. I don’t have time to go into detail, but his technique leaves a lot to be desired if you watch him closely.. Why is a 6’7 OT with elite athleticism the 5th OT taken in a weak draft? That’s a red flag for me. People are blindly praising the pick in here without ever watching the kid play 

He's 100% a project player and everyone should hope like hell that he doesn't see the field this year. That said I don't mind the pick because Carolina has a good online coach and he shouldn't be pressed to start this season at all. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

let me elaborate....Ekwonu was an average (at best) LT.  His contract and injury make him a very unique situation.  If he comes back, it is likely that he loses some of his lateral movement and agility.  When he was drafted, many said he'd be a great G if he does not work out at T.  This season, our guards turn 30.  The $$ we are paying them + paying Bryce.  Ekwonu should move inside, making us younger and cheaper at 2 positions.  So long term, this was a great move--and I am surprised that we did it.

We will try to get a LB in round 2, but a DT is possible too.  Boston (WR) is also an option 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, carpanfan96 said:

He's 100% a project player and everyone should hope like hell that he doesn't see the field this year. That said I don't mind the pick because Carolina has a good online coach and he shouldn't be pressed to start this season at all. 

Exactly, I hate it. “Hoping like hell” that pick #19 doesn’t see the field is never a good feeling.. Of course the best GM Howie Roseman take Lemon right after us.  So frustrating 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, flagfootballcoach28 said:

Exactly, I hate it. “Hoping like hell” that pick #19 doesn’t see the field is never a good feeling.. Of course the best GM Howie Roseman take Lemon right after us.  So frustrating 

You shouldn't hate it, they basically got the best LT in this draft at 19 because he doesn't have experience and needs refinement on technique because of that lack of experience. If he had started another year in college, he goes top 10 bare minimum this draft if not higher. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This team heavily invested in the O-line during last year’s offseason. It was the right move to start building the offense, but we now have an inordinate amount of resources tied up there for the foreseeable future.

Assuming Freeling develops, he’ll give us the flexibility to more evenly distribute those resources across other units while maintaining talent across the O-line. That means two or three key contributors in the future versus one starting rookie safety or receiver today. 

Edited by Jacabee
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He is a great guy but a horrible reporter. He makes my skin crawl when I hear his name. I heard that babies cry and dogs attack him when he enters a room. Other than that he is a good dude. Now go burn in hades u sum bit. 
    • The job just really passed him by. He came up when basically you just needed to get three or four quotes, toss a couple of team provided stats in there, and stretch it out to column length. you got your copy in by 330, out the door by 4, then chill/shmooze the rest of the day. If you were really good you got a book deal. Every now and then you got to write an editorial. The goal of the profession was like Peter King where ostensibly you’re a beat writer for whomever but you get paid to just shoot the poo. now it’s a 24 hour job, you’ve gotta be social media savvy, the pace has increased substantially, you’re expected to produce more than ever, you gotta be able to look through bullshit etc. there’s still risk of industry capture where you just become a mouth piece. Sheena Quick is obviously shameless. I don’t think Newton ever aspired to be more than an inoffensive beat writer, but even that relatively simple role was just more than he was cut out for. its even worse when you’re covering a team that expects the Fourth Estate to act as a PR extension, or considers them on par with buying Twitter bots to promote Bryce. there were over thirty papers that covered the panthers first training camp. In that environment there’s room for boring guys like newton, and they may even be incentivized to push the boundary a little. But today that just isn’t the case and most of the guys are hanging on until retirement (person, gantt) or they’re good and gonna be matched up like Jordan. im not defending the current state of sports journalism, just saying that what counts as a meat and potatoes beat writer passed newton by. He’s retiring well past his sell by date, but that’s pretty common for his generation in general. 
×
×
  • Create New...