Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carson Palmer = Yes Please


Zod

Recommended Posts

Lettuce ketchup. jimmy is garbage, matt is trash. Carson would be perfect for us. Sign him to a 1 yr contract and go from there

We can't sign him to anything as long as the Bengals own his rights. That was my point when I said let's talk about this after they release him, which isn't going to happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He signed a contract. He should honor it. What about his teammates? Its not like he played even average last year. He's just not in a position to make demands like this which is why Im not surprised the Bengals are laughing and telling him "go retire".

This. If you sign a contract, man up and honor it. The only reason not to honor is health related issues, and since he wants to be traded, that isn't the case.

That being said, I still wouldn't mind if he became our QB, but I don't see it happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This. If you sign a contract, man up and honor it. The only reason not to honor is health related issues, and since he wants to be traded, that isn't the case.

That being said, I still wouldn't mind if he became our QB, but I don't see it happening.

How do you feel about how the ownership side honors contracts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

only way i would be cool with palmer being here is if he is a backup.

i don't care who we have starting as long as it is someone they are looking at being here long term and could be the franchise guy. that isn't palmer.

if the team thinks that clausen can be that guy then they need to get him back in there soon to let him show it. he doesn't need to be sitting on the sidelines if they thing he can be the franchise QB. neither does any other guy they feel could be it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

only way i would be cool with palmer being here is if he is a backup.

i don't care who we have starting as long as it is someone they are looking at being here long term and could be the franchise guy. that isn't palmer.

if the team thinks that clausen can be that guy then they need to get him back in there soon to let him show it. he doesn't need to be sitting on the sidelines if they thing he can be the franchise QB. neither does any other guy they feel could be it.

Palmer probably wants to start & he's 31 years old post major surgery. He still managed to throw 26 tds last year and it was probably one of his worst performance wise in his career. I wouldn't be mad if we got him, but if we're looking for a backup vet he's not the fit. Bulger/Volek would make more sense if available from this approach.

Palmer makes sense if we're looking for a guy that can find that second wind and finish his career strong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do you feel about how the ownership side honors contracts?

I was gonna point out that a contract is an agreement between 2 parties. Owners break contracts all the time.

If we could trade 1st's and get Palmer, we'd still have the #4 pick. We could get a damn good defensive player, have a QB to play for a couple of years while <insert young Panthers QB here> holds a clipboard, and have all the injured players from last year back. Including DWill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have said it before, once Chad and TO were off the field last year, he looked a lot better because he wasn't trying to force the ball to one of them.

who cares about the garbage time of a season???

by the way, palmer wasnt very good on 09 either...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Palmer probably wants to start & he's 31 years old post major surgery. He still managed to throw 26 tds last year and it was probably one of his worst performance wise in his career. I wouldn't be mad if we got him, but if we're looking for a backup vet he's not the fit. Bulger/Volek would make more sense if available from this approach.

Palmer makes sense if we're looking for a guy that can find that second wind and finish his career strong.

i don't care if he wants to start, although i think he should want to just to keep the actual starter on his toes.

starting him does nothing good long term for the franchsie.

i don't think that he has a second wind. he's done. he's toast. he might have a year or two of mediocre play, but i'd rather us really develop a franchise guy and let him play instead of spin our wheels and hope the guy can play after he sits for a couple years behind palmer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just to be clear: I'm not "downplaying" the talent around Bryce... I'm qualifying it. There's a big difference between saying, "we finally have building blocks that we're actually developing" and "we've done enough to say this is a finished product, NO EXCUSES!" It's possible to believe that the 2023 situation was bad and to believe that the current state, while improved, is still incomplete. That's not inconsistency; that's nuance. As for the footwork stuff, again, I've seen the same clips as others. The claim that Bryce is hopping to see over the line just isn't one I've seen corroborated by analysts or tape breakdown. "Both feet off of the ground to throw" happens a ton for QBs (ex: Mahomes, Rodgers, Purdy, etc.), especially when improvising. You're right that there were some encouraging flashes from Bryce last season, and it's nice to finally hear that after so much time was spent pretending otherwise. I'm not arguing that Bryce is elite, I'm just asking that we evaluate him using consistent, measurable criteria to determine his status as a top-10 QB... whether it's via 3rd down %, red zone efficiency, turnover-worthy plays, or yes, big-time throws (which, by the way, has been a valid part of QB evaluation across the league for years even if it wasn't used here during Kyle Allen or Teddy Bridgewater's years. For reference: Allen had 20 BTT at a 3.9% rate. Teddy had 17 BTT at 3.3%). Like you, I'm hoping to see a competent, entertaining offense this season. That's a baseline we can all root for, even if we don't have the same baseline for what makes a QB top-10 (which, to be fair, is what this conversation has been about... though I respect the attempt to reframe it).
    • I am optimistic that we might be on the verge of fielding a sustainable offense finally. The Bryce stats listed above are definitely encouraging. I don’t want to overly inflate this and disregard the previous 1 and a half seasons of production from Bryce and “cherry pick” stats but do hope the benching turns into an inflection point in his trajectory.      Lots of excitement heading into this season. 
    • Summary The 2024 Carolina defense posted a 44.9 grade last year, which was the worst in the NFL since 2020. They also had the worst receiving grade in the NFL despite a QB that emerged in the second half of last year. TMac is most likely WR1 in this class and is now WR1 in Carolina He's going to be incredibly helpful on go balls, dig routes, and in the redzone. Highlights show just that: First highlight is Arizona vs. Utah. 4 verts vs. cover-0, TMac lined up alone on a go ball vs. press = we're launching it Second highlight shows his potential as the X. Runs a backside in-cut and the Tampa-2 MLB sells out on the corner route, leaving his back to TMac. Tough over the middle, explosive after the play. Sees TMac doing a lot of what Mike Evans was asked to do in Tampa. Third highlight shows how effective TMac is in the redzone and it's his one-handed catch vs. Travis Hunter. Brings "indefensible plays." Has size advantage that can beat guys, can jump, and has ridiculous hands. Will help Bryce in year 3 as it will allow him to continue playing "fearless" like he did after coming back from benching. Highlights show where TMac fits and re-emphasizes how he's going to make things easier on go balls, dig routes, and in the redzone: Fourth highlight shows Bryce vs. ATL when he hit AT vs. AJ Terrell down the sideline. Bryce has to hold the single deep safety during his drop to give Thielen a chance (who is only 4yds off of the LOS when Bryce is throwing it). Registers the big-time throw attacking vertically. Fifth highlight is vs. KC on a blitz where Bolton is coming downhill while Karlaftis is dropping back over the middle. Has an in-route that has outside leverage with Chris Jones applying immediate pressure. Layered it over Karlaftis' head for the completion. Sixth highlight is the fade route TD to David Moore vs. Zona. in the redzone. David Moore was the X on this play. Thought this was interesting, especially considering recent conversations about Bryce's intermediate game needing to be better:
×
×
  • Create New...