Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So how do you feel about our saftey position?


BigBoss

Recommended Posts

Do you think we'll be sufficient there or will we be hurting bad like last year? Ron and Dave seem to think there will be no problems, but to be completely honest, after what we've seen in the last two years I have my doubts. I haven't really seen any proven players come for FS position and Charles is decent but not extremely consistent ( though I love his physicality).

 

I was just wondering everybody else feels on the subject?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope everyone is right about Mike Mitchell.

 

It reminds me of last year when everyone said Naka would be good because he learned from Ed Reed...

 

In my opinion, there isn't enough film available to fans for anyone to know anything about Mitchell other then that he hits anything that moves.

 

What concerns me is that in today's NFL, quarterbacks will find that one weakness and attack it (i.e. our safety). I'd feel a hell of a lot better with Charles Woodson back there on a two year contract than anyone on the current roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mitchell's speed and his willingness to get physical bodes well for us I'd say. We haven't had a guy playing back there like that in a while. Martin and Godfrey havent exactly struck fear into the hearts of our opponents...

He has a chance to win a job. Hopefully he emerges...if not...then the secondary is SOL anyways

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mitchell can be good if used properly. I'm not sold on his ability to cover, but he can hit and be physical and bring good intensity to the secondary in a way we haven't had in a while. I almost see a young Chris Harris in him, though more athletic.

 

Trouble with that is Harris never could cover worth a damn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think his football IQ is well below average. I do not think he can read defenses at all. He is not the long term answer. I'm getting worried about DC. I think he has problems seeing the big picture for each game. Some people can't accept it, but this game is greatly affected by momentum. It's hard to explain but you can just feel his decisions break it at least two or three times a game (I think he is pretty solid when it comes to 4th down decisions). My biggest concern is this. You have seen these coaches time and time again. For some reason you have these coaches that absolutely will not go with what is working. We need a name for these coaches, what is it? If something is working great, they just do not have the intelligence to comprehend that something working is actually good for their team. They cannot understand this. AND REPORTERS NEED TO CALL THIS OUT. Rushing was insane for the past two games...ok let's take half his carries away and have Bryce air it out (look at the attempts he had). The reporters need to freaking ask "((this)) was working, you didn't do ((this)), do you consider that bad coaching? If so, why? If not, why do you defend doing the opposite of what it best?" Anyone knows you keep doing something until they stop it. But you have these coaches that think the are going to pull a fast one on them and do the thing that is not working. Dave is starting to remind me of that guy in the movie Kung Pow. I think his name was Weeblow or something, he had those squeaky shoes when he ran around. The Kung Fu masters trained him wrong as a joke, so he did things to get the crap beat out of him instead of winning the fight. I am going to start calling Dave Canales WEEBLOW if he keeps doing the opposite of what would win. But seriously, if he is going to be that type of coach, I would honestly get rid of him after this season. You 100% do not want a coach with this flaw...they may have one good fluke season but it will be years of terrible teams.
    • I mean the Bronco's only won by 1, but no one there is complaining.
    • A QB who can't consistently throw the ball 20 yards downfield has no business being a starting QB in this league. That is a backup QB who you put in there to manage a game when your starter goes down.
×
×
  • Create New...