Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CSR raises questions about Beason at strong side


AntiBuc

Recommended Posts

Obviously you have to put Keek and Beason where they play the best, being the two best LB's. Davis can do w/e the team needs him to do, not like he is an investment or anything. IMO, Davis isn't going to see much time on field, there will be a LB that steps up and take a lot of reps away from him.

 

?????

 

Davis is amazing at what he does what are you talking about?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found the article on CBS that portrays Beason as selfish and not a team player based on him no restructuring.

 

Joe Person (take it for what you will) has indicated that Beason has not been approached to restructure, so my question is why would a player just give up millions of dollars without being asked?

 

That's just being foolish.

 

Regardless, Beason has stated that he is willing to do whatever it takes to make the team better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Beason wasn't all that good at WLB in 2010 either. I'm not overly enthused about moving TD from the spot where he's flourished to make room for a guy who wasn't nearly as good when he played there, but camp will tell the story.

A healthy TD > healthy Beason at WLB....and Beason admits it
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep.  Davis was an absolute beast at WLB in Meeks' Tampa 2 style defense in 2009.  He looked great last year too and I think should be even better this year.  Now it comes down to, how much of a downgrade is it to put Beason at SLB and how well can Davis play there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ive said it for a while, i think Beason would make an outstanding strongside backer. Hes easily the best stack and shed linebacker and the one that is better fit to take on blocks. I think keeping Kuechly and Davis where they are would be the best move. Beason can still make plays at Sam. Look at Anderson for proof of that. He led the team in tackles and had set the franchise record for tackles in a season at Sam. And he was arguably playing out of position as well (better wlb likely).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When the huddle crashed a little while ago (may have been during the draft, I don't remember) I went to an inferior site for the first time and saw someone talking about how they get an influx of people from here whenever this site crashes because of the shitty servers used here. I was thinking, if we were in a bar right now I'd punch this guy in the throat. Carolinahuddle.com is my site you basic bitch. I then felt like kind of a nerd for even thinking twice about defending a website I frequent against non-huddlers. I live a sad life.

/endrage

Zod should have got the roid upgrade for the server rodents. That way even if the servers went down he could have released angry roid craving rodents on an inferior site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right. But you do understand that there is no such thing as not signing free agents, right? That's what I mean. So make some good free agency moves and do well in the draft. That's step one. If you can't accomplish that, then this will just keep getting worse.
    • Sweet jebus this is idiotic Yes, overall team success in this league, you need a good QB, but beyond just that painfully obvious fact, let's get into the rest of the stupid in there......... First things first, you say.. "if we need a good QB for him to have success, then why are you drafting that player with the #1 pick" Show me one time I've ever said we would need a good QB for T-Mac himself to have success... you can't, because I never have.  I think you're referring to the "he's bad enough that we then have a Top 5 pick to target a QB" part of my post, which is very clearly talking about said QB, not T-Mac.  The other way to interpret that is just overall team success, which again, wouldn't be anything about T-Mac or his ability to impact the offense or overall team wins and losses. I'm quite sure I could do this with a number of teams over the years, but I don't want to spend the time to do multiple, so I'll keep it to just the 2023 Vikings right now since you wanted to use Jefferson as your example....... The Vikings went 3-6 after Cousins went down last year.  And two of those wins came before Jefferson even came back from his own injury, they were 1-4 in the final 5 weeks after Jefferson came back. In those 5 games, Jefferson had 31 catches, 503 yards, and 2 TDs Having the WR you specifically called out didn't help them go better than 1-4 with a bad QB, even though he still put up a great stat line for that time period either.  It also didn't make that QB good enough to where they then went out and brought in TWO new QB's this year to replace Doubs and Mullens who started down the stretch for them last year. And that's with 4th year Jefferson, not a rookie that T-Mac would be If you expect a WR getting drafted #1 overall to be the player to turn a franchise as bad as we are around in 1 season, make whatever QB we're able to put in there be successful, and lead us to a solid season, then you are literally insane. We are AWFUL, we have a few young guys who could turn into great players, but we are so far from being a good team, that there isn't any player we could draft next year that is going to change that in 2025.
×
×
  • Create New...