Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anyone else get the feeling Kugzilla will go to IR


Zod

Recommended Posts

I don't think he goes to IR unless he misses his targeted return date, but I do think that return to practice time-frame of "next week" will be a binary decision of he's back or he's to IR.

 

I don't expect to see any drawn out will he be back or won't he drama.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, they're putting him onto the field with the first string during "installs". I very seriously doubt they would even bother with making sure HE is the one that runs mental reps during the first time run through of play installations, if they weren't planning on having him back this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always get confused when players get put onto IR for simple and non serious injuries. I thought it was just a hamstring? I can see how it lingers and its a pain to come back from one.

If a player cant play week 1, do they have to be on the PUP or IR? Rules?

 

there aren't rules for it, no, but those designations save a roster spot that someone who is healthy can fill.

 

Usually, though, guys will be put onto IR for non-serious injuries when a) the coaches/front office thinks there is someone else on the team who can do similar things but want to keep both players around, b) the player is a prospect/project that the team is working on and developing for the future and instead of placing that player on the PS (which means they have to clear waivers and can still be signed by another team), the immediately are stashed away for the future without another team trying to get at them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...