Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dan Morgan says Bobby > Luke


Zod

Recommended Posts

this doesn't excuse misinformation

It is all about opinion that polarizes...with that in mind you understand 100% of all programming at ESPN and other outlets.

A program where the hosts debate how close each game is bcause there is so much talent on both sides so it is too hard to tell is boring.

Old sports radio used to break down games and was more barber shop type debate. Now all stories are made by fan email breaking down keywords...so if you write Stop with RG3 and TEBOE news all the mothership will do is see tou mentioned RG3 and TeBoE and make more stories.

..Colin Cowherd (most hate him I understand) breaks this down often. He was hired to give strong opinions not break down gams bc he is not well vered or has interest in that arena.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really. Lets take a look at the important measurables for a linebacker from their combine performance (Wagner didn't do the combine, he did a pro day)

Winner in bold....

Luke Bobby

20 yard dash 2.59 2.64

10 yard dash 1.56 1.57

Bench Press 27 24

Vertical 38 39.5

20 yard shuttle 4.12 4.28

3 cone 6.92 7.10

As a physical prototype middle linebacker, Luke wins hand down.

Also pro days are drastically rigged in the players favor. Its why everyone has a pro day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am high, but that’s besides the point! The blue line is not good right now. I’ve said it all year. I don’t think this group meshes well. Slaven has been just OK Niki up and down Miller up and down ghost and Walker have been your most consistent guys. Maybe it comes together more towards the playoffs
    • I was expecting to see more cap room moves by now, which may be to suggest that we are not going to be that aggressive.  I have mixed emotions about that (because I think we have 3 needs on D and 3 needs on O--starters).  If you look to the draft for 3 starters, that is ambitious.  We need 6
    • Yeah we shouldn’t be competing with teams, bidding wise, to sign a WR. There will be one for us and our budget.  I keep saying, how many balls will there be to go around anyway? One thing good I will say for this offense is the ball has been spread around at times. Seems like I remember seeing a large number of guys have caught passes in a game. Or been targeted at least. 3 RBs 4 or 5 WRs 2-3 TEs type of stat lines. 10-11 guys.  Not every week but that happens.    As far as WR in general, we need the smaller agile and quicker component to compliment what is there. After that it should be about depth, having good backups for the starters so we can run things consistently still, if a guy is out for a week or two. That is especially important in game where you have to finish the game with who you made active. 
×
×
  • Create New...