Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ron and Mike say they will open up the offense,do you believe it?


Jmac

Recommended Posts

of course they will. if greg had caught those two passes we'd have had plenty more opportunities, cam would've probably gone over 200 yards, possibly for two touchdowns if deangelo hadn't fumbled on the seahawks 8, beating NFC powerhouse seattle 14-12 (or better.) this would've been a great statline against an elite team, and this thread wouldn't exist.

 

deanglo's fumble and olsen's drops had nothing to do with whether or not the offense was "opened up."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All Shula has to do is have a center hike the ball to Cam.....

It isn't tough to not be conservative. Seattle is a poor gauge. Again, look at last season. we weren't explosive against them not did we try. You can't just fling it around with them for lots of reasons.

To a degree it is like having Jake as your QB....no matter the gameplan 17 just wasnt conservative in nature. If a playcall had a potential deep bomb route 17 had the option of.....he likely would fling it if there were less than 6 guys on 89

Link to comment
Share on other sites

of course they will. if greg had caught those two passes we'd have had plenty more opportunities, cam would've probably gone over 200 yards, possibly for two touchdowns if deangelo hadn't fumbled on the seahawks 8, beating NFC powerhouse seattle 14-12 (or better.) this would've been a great statline against an elite team, and this thread wouldn't exist.

deanglo's fumble and olsen's drops had nothing to do with whether or not the offense was "opened up."

tumblr_m37l2kbHzI1qihztbo1_400.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How about just don't draft project players in the first round? How about especially when you have arguably the worst roster in the NFL(we did all those years in question)? You don't even have to dig into those player debates specifically. Just don't grasp at straws early in the draft.
    • I think there were 9, and since I haven't took time to watch each of them on each play individually Its impossible for me to say, which I doubt you have either.   It's not a stat driven grading system; it's a per play grading system.  Tommy Tremble making a great block to spring Rico for that 10-yard run might actually score higher on that play then Ricos run. The actual run might not be anything special; it might be a run that pretty much every back in the league would have made. Here again, I would guess, if you look at every RB in the league, he is towards the top in rushing grade for the year which is what most of us are seeing.  Whether you call that a 90/80/70, 50/40/30, A/B/C, Gold/Green/Red star, it doesn't really matter it's how he ranks relative to everybody else at his position.      
    • Well I will never knock a strong arm, in a vacuum, but it is a lot more than that to it.  Did we kill our roster building and our defense in particular to stick PJ out there?  No. We knew we sucked and he was really just a temporary thing too.  While with Bryce I see the up and down, mostly down, roller coaster on loop now in year three. It has been a Looooong time.    Back to strong arms, it is like having a powerful motor in a car. All the power in the world isn’t going to overcome a bad driver.   But at the same time, even a decent drive with a killer car will beat the best driver if you put him in a go kart   Exaggerating for effect, I know Bryce is not a go kart. Maybe closer to a 6 cylinder with not much displacement….. 
×
×
  • Create New...