Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If we could trade owners


Panthro

Recommended Posts

Would you rather have any of the other 31 owners over Jerry "fleeces the fans" richardson? Is there an owner in the NFL you wouldnt prefer ole Jerry over?

I mean Daniel Snyder loves money and he may fail as an owner... but that doesn't mean he doesn't try to win. I would take 31 other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More accurate of a topic!

I would take anyone passionate and involved in local media. I dont need the Colts owner tweeting every five minutes like Ursay but he is passionate.

I like the Ravens owner..he handles things with class and hires the best of the best to run his team.

Jerry does the Wizard of Oz routine too much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Jerry Richardson . . . he’s going to criticize Peyton Manning and Drew Brees and their intelligence in our meeting Saturday?" Feely said.  "And sit there and say dismissively to Manning  ‘Do I need to help you read a revenue chart son?  Do I need to help break that down for you because I don’t know if you know how to read that?’"

 

 

 

"[Richardson] was extremely condescending to them, especially toward Peyton," an unnamed source told Cole. "[Richardson] was the only person on either side who was contentious.  Everybody else was respectful.  They might have said, ‘I disagree with your point,’ but at least they were respectful.  [Richardson] was not."
 
For example, when Manning was talking about player safety, Richardson reportedly said, "What do you know about player safety?"

 

 

 

 

Richardson widely is believed to be intent on driving a hard bargain with the players.  He reportedly said during the March 2010 ownership meetings that it’s time to "take back our league."
 
"We signed a [expletive] deal last time and we’re going to stick together and take back our league and [expletive] do something about it," Richardson said, per Michael Silver of Yahoo! Sports, via Cole.

 

 

 

richardson.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would trade for the Packers owners. That's right the people, because if I owned a share of the Panthers,(and I'm sure many of you would do this as well) I'd be in the CEOs ear, email, text, phone call, real mail, and across the street until we changed something.

The fact we kept Shula for continuity with Cam should've been a warning sign. He was kept for continuity with the coaching staff and continuity with ownership, not for Cam.

If heads don't go rolling tomorrow at 10 AM and their reasoning is continuity, I will ride my scooter, all 35 mph from Raleigh to Charlotte and start a poo storm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

"[Richardson] was extremely condescending to them, especially toward Peyton," an unnamed source told Cole. "[Richardson] was the only person on either side who was contentious.  Everybody else was respectful.  They might have said, ‘I disagree with your point,’ but at least they were respectful.  [Richardson] was not."
 
For example, when Manning was talking about player safety, Richardson reportedly said, "What do you know about player safety?"

 

 

A few months later, Peyton met with Luck, shortly before he declared he's staying in school.

 

(my timeline could be off but the point is, that kind of thing will happen to you when you're an asshole)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally would rather have any of the other 31 owners.  I cant think of another owner that is content to sit back and watch the same train wreck year after year.  Im not saying that other franchises improve by leaps and bounds but they are at least willing to make changes.  Here we take MUCH too long to turn over the rostercoaches when they arent producing in the name of saving a money. Even Paul Brown has changed his tune in the name of winning. As long as Panther fans accept losing, JR will not pay or accept the quality coaches needed to field a consistent winner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I will as soon as you withdraw your fandom from the Patriots. Informative threads are great but all of these estrogen and emotion driven threads you start are ridiculous.
    • Will be there tonight and expect nothing from the Canes. They are soft and won't go after anyone, nor will they respond when, not if, Florida starts bullying them. Not to mention Freddie is in net. I fear this will be an ass-kicking.  
    • Is this not a bit contradictory?  Also surely if any of us are smart enough to evaluate what we're seeing in real time, a former NFL QB can at least manage the same.  Especially considering he's basing his analysis on hours (maybe generous?) of reviewing All-22 footage which he can play back over and over again, focusing each time on different position groups, match-ups, progressions, etc. which is simply impossible for a fan to fully assess in real time.  Unless you're actually at the game, we basically only get the QB/O-line in frame during the broadcast and even in that limited window of the field, there is simply too much happening.  I'm usually broadly focusing on Bryce, maybe peeping the footwork (or lack thereof) and just the overall pocket and whether there is any pressure coming.  I'm not able to watch every individual one-on-one o-line match-up on top of it to see who got beat, who didn't pick up a blitz, which o-lineman didn't shift to help double-team, or whatever else. I think the truth is somewhere in between (as is almost always the case).  Knowing the play call, audible, etc. is pretty important when judging individual performances, which is why we should always take PFF grades with a grain of salt.  But yeah we can also get a pretty good overall sense of how a player is performing just from watching the game on the couch on Sundays.  I still think there's a lot of value in a review video like this.  As long as you have the bare minimum media literacy to take the interesting insights while also acknowledging inherent biases from a video like this (i.e. obviously focusing on the good over the bad).
×
×
  • Create New...