Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kurt Cobain's Cildhood Home For Sale


Anybodyhome

Recommended Posts

http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/3d281c11a96b4ad082fe88aa0db04305/Article_2013-09-25-Kurt%20Cobain%20House/id-57e12874444b4837acd90cd75ef70a59

 

"The home, last assessed at less than $67,000, is being listed for $500,000. It's a short walk from a riverfront park dedicated to Cobain's memory, and the family said it would welcome a partnership to make the home into a museum. His room still has the stencil-like band names — Iron Maiden, Led Zeppelin — he reportedly put on the walls, as well as the holes he put in them."

 

"We've decided to sell the home to create a legacy for Kurt, and yes, there are some mixed feelings since we have all loved the home and it carries so many great memories," Cobain's sister, Kim Cobain, said in an emailed statement. "But our family has moved on from Washington, and (we) feel it's time to let go of the home."

 

28056590.jpg

 

Can you say "Money grab?" $500k for this? Seriously?

 

And I'll admit my bias as my opinion of Kurt Cobain and his music is quite possibly the most overrated stuff I've ever heard. The comparisons of his songwriting talent to Dylan and Lennon, the musicianship forever linked to another Seattle guitarist, Jimi Hendrix.....

 

Stop... just stop. The music wasn't that good, it's just that a lot of angst-starved music critics were done with the hair metal thing of the late 80's and needed something, anything to replace Poison, Motley Crue, Whitesnake, Great White and all the other hair metal bands. Just one problem some 20 years later... all those hair metal bands are still touring while the "grunge" movement lasted all of about 10 years. Sure, some of those bands are still out there, but....

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that Kurt is a bit overrated.  I'll also admit that he probably wasn't even the most talented musician in the band (honor goes to Grohl), but to say 80's hair metal was better or more relevant, is just not true.  Most of the big bands ARE still around.  Alice in Chains, Pearl Jam (better than ever), Soundgarden, Foo Fighters, are still putting out music and making a nice bit of cash.  Grunge was more than a genre, it was more like an era.  Bands today are still byproducts of grunge influences, whereas I hardly hear anything on the radio (new stuff, not saying it's "good" new stuff) that has been influenced by hair metal.   Grunge and post-grunge movement has lasted way longer than hair metal bands.   Their shows are good fun, don't get my wrong, and that's why people still go, but there is hardly any influence there.

 

And it was really Guns n Roses that killed hair metal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that Kurt is a bit overrated.  I'll also admit that he probably wasn't even the most talented musician in the band (honor goes to Grohl), but to say 80's hair metal was better or more relevant, is just not true.  Most of the big bands ARE still around.  Alice in Chains, Pearl Jam (better than ever), Soundgarden, Foo Fighters, are still putting out music and making a nice bit of cash.  Grunge was more than a genre, it was more like an era.  Bands today are still byproducts of grunge influences, whereas I hardly hear anything on the radio (new stuff, not saying it's "good" new stuff) that has been influenced by hair metal.   Grunge and post-grunge movement has lasted way longer than hair metal bands.   Their shows are good fun, don't get my wrong, and that's why people still go, but there is hardly any influence there.

 

And it was really Guns n Roses that killed hair metal.

 

I didn't claim hair metal to be more relevant or better, I simply pointed out they are still on the road filling arenas while the resurgent Pearl Jam and other bands of the time are still playing to niche crowds.

 

I love AIC and Soundgarden, but one thing all of the grunge bands have in common- they all took hiatuses and returned with a newer sound that appeals to a wider audience than the original genre. The new Pearl Jam is "better than ever," as you say, because they've changed their style and become more mainstream. Some grunge purists would even argue that Pearl Jam has sold out, which was their own biggest rallying cry against the business in the 90's.

 

I would have to argue the whole "era versus genre" notion however. My frequent visits to iTunes in search of the new and obscure provide my reference. iTunes genres include metal, alternative and and hair metal, while there is no mention of grunge. It's simply lumped into the "altenative" category.

 

I don't hear the influence of grunge as much as you may, simply because of our listening tastes. But there is a reason Steel Panther is still the longest running concert on the Sunset Strip, first at the Roxy, now the House of Blues.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason you don't see grunge in itunes is because it's not really a genre, like I said, it's more of an era.  Technically, it probably is alternative like most of the rock in the 90's.  

 

And you are incorrect, Pearl Jam sells out almost everywhere.  The tickets for the Charlotte concert sold out in like minutes for TWC, I know, because I tried to snag some initially.  Pearl Jams' last album and so far the new one actually sound like "old" PJ so I'm not sure they really have sold out, since they are rarely even played on the radio.  I'm pretty sure you have to be getting radio airplay and whatnot to sell out.

 

I wouldn't really say AIC's sound changed that much either, just with a different guy singing with Layne.  

 

Besides, Neil Young was the godfather of grunge anyway, not Kurt.

 

Steel Panther is basically a parody of the 80's hair metal that everyone makes fun of, it's as much as a comedic act as anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
    • Winning ain't gonna make my eyes lie to me. Context matters, and it will always matter in the game of football.
    • That TD pass to Legette against Miami. Elite. The play where Bryce rolls right to buy time until Tet can reverse field.  Bryce pumps as multiple defenders close in.  He barely gets it away before he takes a big time hit.  Beautiful off platform throw and great catch by Tet.   The second TD to Tet against Dallas where Bryce dips and turns his shoulder in to evade the pass rusher.  Resets and finds Tet in the end zone. Dude embodies the Keep Pounding mantra.  
×
×
  • Create New...