Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"Team Name Here"'s offense didn't show up against the Panthers


CPcavedweller

Recommended Posts

I'm so tired of hearing that someone or something hasn't shown up, and it's constantly chatter about how an offense of some team didn't show up. Whenever that is continuously being mentioned you would think they would notice a trend. That or they believe teams just show up for the lowly Panthers game.

Carry on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if the defense is as good as we think/hope it is...even the dumbest of people will notice a trend eventually.

They have certainly shown the ability to be really special. They still need to do it on a consistent basis and when it matters most to get and deserve any accolades. Let's hope that we have seen the first step towards that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You all have such short term memory. I hear most talk about the Seahawks game and the offense not showing up. Wilson was harassed all day long and we nearly held them without a TD. The Bills game wasn't dominant but without the game winning TD drive it's another tune.

I'm honestly not worried about individual games. The point of this thread is is to say that everytime the Panthers are referred to it's because someone didn't show up. There's a positive correlation between the not showing up line and the performance of the defense. Now that I spelled it out for you all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You all have such short term memory. I hear most talk about the Seahawks game and the offense not showing up. Wilson was harassed all day long and we nearly held them without a TD. The Bills game wasn't dominant but without the game winning TD drive it's another tune.

I'm honestly not worried about individual games. The point of this thread is is to say that everytime the Panthers are referred to it's because someone didn't show up. There's a positive correlation between the not showing up line and the performance of the defense. Now that I spelled it out for you all.

 

4 losing seasons in a row...  no one gives a poo about respecting losing teams... 

 

 

/spelled out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are all seriously not reading my post. It's not simply from a numbers stand point or boo fuggidy who. It's just that any time, I hear about a supposedly good or should be good team, it's, "oh well they didn't show up at Carolina." I like that fact that two out of our three games have become, "well, against Carolina" kind of games.

I'm just saying there is a correlation now between, "against Carolina, blah bloo blah didn't show up." As opposed to a Jimmy Clausen butt fumble or Jimmy taking the snap and running for a TD for the other team.

A positive correlation meaning, there is a connection between two phenomena that are interconnected. Our defense plays well, the "team name here"s offense didn't show up.

You all either have terrible reading comprehension or just don't read posts and only read the title.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • "If only Bryce were <height>", he'd <insert stupid thing here>" was the bit and in direct response to multiple posters ridiculously blaming Bryce (and only Bryce) for the punt returns vs. New England. :3 I understand that folks desire balance, hence the "Bryce stans vs. Bryce haters" narrative but it's abundantly clear that the only people going into threads just to talk about Bryce are the haters. Meanwhile, daring to disagree that Bryce was completely at fault for something that happened on special teams gets the "stan" label. Shoot, I'm sure folks lump me in as a Bryce stan (Brycen stan? Absolutely. Bryce stan? Nah) just because I have the audacity to look at what the rest of the team is and isn't doing. 😛  
    • PJ Walker is the only QB in the Tepper era the Panthers managed to find wins with.  Only QB w/ a winning record.    PJ had success in pro ball before the Panthers.  He he had NFL tools.    He just is consistent and unreliable.  PJ Walker is what you call a bad/poor man's gunslinger.  He can provide highs and lows both virtually guaranteed.  He is NFL depth.  Bryce Young hasn't proven to improve a teams chances of winning better than the PJ Walker tier of QBing. PJ Walker can do things Bryce Young can't......and that a problem     
    • There isn’t but the thing is the team/system/staff around the QB ultimately dictates how successful that QB can be. You have Baker getting released midseason here vs playing like a MVP on another team. Darnold on the Jets/Panthers vs Vikings/Seahawks. Geno Smith on the Jets vs the Seahawks vs the Raiders. Mac Jones is looking as good as Purdy on the 49ers. You have to build a roster, culture, and system for these guys.  Obviously the QB has to be the leader and help elevate the team, but we are seeing what moving a “bad” QB to a stable franchise looks like. Daniel Jones might be doing the same but it’s too early to tell. 
×
×
  • Create New...