Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chris Harris (ESPN): "Cam Newton is good. His receivers aren't"


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Ginns drop was a potential TD but has he dropped many others? I thought he's been playing pretty well... And that drop last night was on his hands but by no means an easy catch...

He's dropped 1 pass and it was against the Bucs. Technically, I'm not sure if that will go as a drop considering it never hit his hands.

I do find it fascinating that someone's brain can process his speed, plus the ball speed, locate and catch without missing a step.

Personally, I forgive him because he turned that drag into 35 yards. Any other receive is down after 13.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO, a lot of things these folks say are quite subjective and needs to be placed in context with both the team and players.

 

There is a reason why some teams, when they get a new QB, go out and get a fresh bunch of Receivers or keep the Receivers they know is mature and can work well with many of the younger QBs. The psychological relationship between a QB and his Receivers is so imortant. That is why those in the media are always talking about the Go To receiver for their choosen QBs.  If it's a Vet QB, you keep hearing that they have to "bringing the Receivers along. It the QB is young, it's gelling or building a good relationship. They understand that football isn't just a physical game, it's also quite psychological.

 

Let's face it, the most important relationship on a team is a QB/Reciver relationship. The question is, who is Cam's strongest Go To Receiver. It cannot just be Smitty. A young QB has to be secure in knowing when he throws a ball his receivers will get it. If they keep dropping it or does so at pivitol times in the game, that does play on the QB's security and trust. If he's forced to throw to a Reciever who is a beloved Vet but that Reciever is getting old and cannot get open enough to catch the balls, but fans believe the QB should throw to him anyway, that is a problem.

 

I think Cam just needs two really strong Recievers that he trusts to throw too, outside of Smitty. Let's be real, the majority of Ints Cam has was on the Receivers more than him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am fine with Ginn in his role. Has good repoir with Cam.

I grade overall our receiver group as C+ or B- at best. Just a fact. Add a gamebreaker in the first round next year, and it could move close to an 'A'

To move this core to an a I think we would need to add a wr and possibly a te. Jist not enuff weapons. A true number 2 wr is a guy who can go off for 100 yards any given night when the d focuses to much on your number one. Lafell can't have morr than 3 100 yard gms in his career. Olsen is closer to a wr than te in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously Harris isn't looking at the targets and drops stats or he would know what we are all saying.  Ginn has not really dropped any passes before Thursday and Smith has dropped the most.  LaFell is inconsistent at best and likely is not a real number 2 this year but as others have said, Ginn really has been. 

 

It is an area where the receivers need to tighten up though and it a legitimate concern.  But I wouldn't call them bad by any stretch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ginns drop was a potential TD but has he dropped many others? I thought he's been playing pretty well... And that drop last night was on his hands but by no means an easy catch...

 

Ginn and Lafell have both become labeled with the dropsies. Stats show that Lafell has been very reliable over his entire career and Ginn has one drop which was a huge bomb.

 

Tavon Austin averages one drop per game in comparison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it is either/ or. The truth is our receivers are pretty much just average. That even goes for Smitty these days :( as he gets older

They don't suck, but they also aren't bailing Cam out, or making incredible individual plays after the catch.

They are just, meh. Not bad but not good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, like I said the other night: It's not the drops that kill me, per se, it's dropping passes at key times.  We got away with a couple against an awful team. Couldn't absorb the drops so well against the likes of the Cardinals or Seahawks (which really ended with a fumble, but "What if...?").

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ginn and Lafell have both become labeled with the dropsies. Stats show that Lafell has been very reliable over his entire career and Ginn has one drop which was a huge bomb.

 

Tavon Austin averages one drop per game in comparison.

 

I've definitely seen Lafell drop more than Ginn, but neither is a HUGE problem.  Lafell dropped that 3rd down conversion in the game that Smitty had his bad drops...

 

As I said last night, I don't recall seeing Ginn drop one before this week...

 

People just want to find something to complain about I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • with arm strength people often get stuck on the distance  arm strength in the NFL is moreso measured in speed / velocity .which of course is how long does it take for  the ball to travel from the time of release until it reaches its target ? & u beat world class speed with more speed on the ball...just saying  
    • No GM hits 100%. I'm well aware. But what a GM has to do is look at the roster, what's available, and future contracts and go from there. XL was a one season wonder in college. He has speed. Who cares. He body catches and his hands are bricks. Speed doesn't matter when you don't actually have the ball. There were other receivers available with better resumes. XL was a project. Fitts loved projects. You don't have the luxury of projects when you just traded away DJ for a QB. 1st round WRs need to contribute now.  Brooks was a luxury RB pick we didn't have the luxury to make. Who cares if Dallas was going to pick him. We had holes all over our defense. Chuba was coming off a fresh contract. We just inked 150m interior line and then centered it by moving a guard to center that had suffered 2 season ending injuries. The most critical area on our line was being held together by a bandaid and a prayer. No surprise when it didn't work.   Wallace is getting better but Wilson was sitting there waiting to be taken. DPOY for college football right there for the taking. That was a gimme pick. If you're going to take a risk on an injured player, the 3rd round for Wilson made a whole lot more sense at a position we were rest stop TP thin at.  4th round and on aren't going to be heavy contributors unless you're lucky.  He did well on the trade for Jackson. Coker, I believe he offered the largest guarantee. He actually got more than some late round picks make.  Those 1st 3 picks, IMO, were straight up whiffs.  Looking back at Fitterer's picks, I think he tried to plug holes because we had a ton of them. Problem was, he wasn't very good at it and he loved RAS scores and developmental players with a coach that couldn't develop a Polaroid. He tried to do too much. He was impatient. His other problem was he panicked during the draft and couldn't read or understand the flow of how drafts tend to go. DJ Johnson was the prime example. We needed an edge rusher and he jumped in at the end of the run instead of starting it.  Morgan's first year looked exactly like Fitts to me. Lots of projects.  2nd year looks better.  We'll see how 3rd year goes. FA also plays into all of this as well but that's a whole different topic of how it played out and planning with regard to drafting. 
    • I judge how good our players are by the way a defense covers them. XL draws no special coverage. Coker on the other hand always has a man over the top. It still doesn’t matter. You be the judge.
×
×
  • Create New...