Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If we come out of the Pats game at 5-5, we will still be in good shape.

CharlottePanther

By CharlottePanther,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

CharlottePanther Newbie

CharlottePanther

Posted
Posted

So 5-5 and 6 games to go..

@Miami-L 5-6

Tampa Bay-W 6-6

@New Orleans-L 6-7

New York-W 7-7

Saints- W 8-7

Falcons- W 9-7

I honestly think thats a worst case senario. Here is the likely outcome for us;

5-5 record:

Miami- W 6-5

Tampa Bay- W 7-5

@New Orleans- L 7-6

Jets- W 8-6

Falcons-W 9-6

Sants- W 10-6

That either wins us the division or atleast a WC imo. We can lose the next two against San Fran and the Pats and still be very much alive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
*FreeFua* Grand Master

*FreeFua*

Posted
Posted

Don't sleep on the jets. There front 4 can make some noise. I'm really glad we play them in Charlotte and not New York. There a different team when on the road.

But I think looking at the schedule it's fair to pencil in a split with the saints. We have to beat the bucs and falcons no matter what. And who knows what Miami team will show up.

Would be awesome to get atleast one of these 2 next games. Seriously considering flying down for the Monday nighter if they win this week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PhillyB Grand Master

PhillyB

Posted
Posted

this is the time of year to start building momentum for the critical december stretch. i'll worry about this team if we drop the next two games because (1) they're against playoff-caliber teams and (2) because it'll give the saints a huge division boost and make our fight concerned with the wildcard and not the division.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherBoy95 Proficient

PantherBoy95

Posted
Posted

NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! I am so tired of us and this fanbase (myself included) being "content!" We have the talent! So how about it gets done!  I used to always find myself watching the fourth quarter clock just hoping it would tick down as fast as possible in hopes that we won't "find a way to lose." Because in the past we always played "Not to lose" instead of "To win."  Now we finally have a team that does what good teams do....WE STEP ON THEIR THROATS AND DON'T LET UP! 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...