Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This wasnt Rivera vs Harbaugh. It was Rivera Vs Rivera and Rivera won.


CharlottePanther

Recommended Posts

What gets lost in this most exquisite win is this game was not Rivera Vs Harbaugh. It was Rivera Vs Old Rivera and Rivera won. Who is the old Rivera you might ask? Well none other than Jim Harbaugh. During this game, it seemed as though someone cloned Rivera pre Buffalo game. You know, the "play not to lose" Rivera. The Rivera that would celebrate FGs and punt on 4th and short in the final minutes of the game, only to be let down with another loss. Yes someone kidnapped Jim Harbaugh and replaced him with pre Buffalo Bills game Ron.

So where am I going with this? Yesterday, the announcer said something during the game that caught my attention. She said "Harbaugh realizes that in this type of game, you play for points and FGs are not bad whatsoever playing a game like this against a stout D like the Panthers." I then immediatley thought, this isnt Jim Harbaugh football. This is play not to lose Rivera 1.0 football. Well, Jim Harbaugh picked a bad to have a bad day. The result? 0 attempts on 4th down, even a 4th and short in our territory which equaled 0 TDs, and 3 FGs for a total of 9 points. The result? 1 point loss.

Now ask yourself this question. If a few weeks ago Marty Mcfly came up to you from his delorean and said.. "The team that lost in this matchup was a team that scored three FGs, no TDs, blew a 9 pt lead and lost by 1 point with 0 4th down attempts." Would you have guessed in your wildest dreams that Mr Mcfly was talking about the 49ers? This was an important game for Ron. Harbaugh played Rivera 1.0 , conservative football. He lost, and Rivera has been redeemed. R.I.P Pre Buffalo Bills Ron.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

didn't they only have 1 4th and short deep in our territory they didnt go for, and it was to give them a 2 score lead?  I dont recall thinking Harbaugh's calls were particularly conservative, but I may be mistaken... I was kinda giddy and shaking through two thirds of the game. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is being aggressive and playing to win but making it a two score game when you're up 6-0 in a defensive game is the smart thing to do.  He made the right call. 

 

Going for it every time you have a chance to isn't smart football and will end up bitting in the ass just as bad as never going for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is being aggressive and playing to win but making it a two score game when you're up 6-0 in a defensive game is the smart thing to do. He made the right call.

Going for it every time you have a chance to isn't smart football and will end up bitting in the ass just as bad as never going for it.

Agreed. You still have to play smart situational football, and yesterday he did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that we had already stuffed them on 3rd and 2 and 3rd and 1 heavily influenced that decision. I thought it was a sign they were afraid of our defense.

 

That said, if they had won, 9-7 it would have been declared an excellent decision. These things are usually decided in retrospect. For example, RR deciding to punt on 4th and 2 on the SF 40ish. Ended up working out well, but if we had lost, people may have 2nd guessed that decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All the people that wanted Jim over Ron need to get on their knees and open their throats.

Erm, of the two, one has a NFC conference championship, the other has two losing seasons and only showed up when his ass was on the hot seat in year three.

I think people who wanted Jim still can be justified in that opinion.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You don’t even need 1b because Tepper is the only one foolish enough to wheel that deal.    Player wise? Jake’s elbow. JR and Pep getting sideways, no Carruth, Cam’s shoulder, Luke’s concussions, it would be a long list of stuff. You can take it down to certain plays in games. Fox chasing 2 point conversions in the SB would be on my list. RMJr slipping at the end of that same game was not helpful. 
    • Ultimately this just amounts to heavy revisionist history. I mean you aren't talking to someone that just popped out the womb a week ago. I was here all throughout the predraft process. The overwhelming majority of the fanbase felt like this was a fine situation and the best situation for a rookie QB to go to compared to Houston for example. The hype for Young and our "rockstar" staff was off the charts. No one could dare speak cautious skepticism of his abilities or they would be neg repped into oblivion. Only after he had one of statistical worst rookie seasons of the last 25 years did we get this narrative now that his rookie season actually shouldn't count. Complete malarkey if you ask me.
    • On the field? Since I guess it qualifies as multiple instances it might not count, but have the damn refs throw some flags on illegal hits to Cam's head in SB50. If that doesn't count, 1A. Cotchery caught it 1B. Kasey keeps that kickoff inbounds. Off the field? 1A. Team is sold to anyone but Tepper 1B. We have the patience not to mortgage the franchise on that Bryce trade. Stroudwpuldve been the better pick but he's not worth it either.
×
×
  • Create New...