Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This wasnt Rivera vs Harbaugh. It was Rivera Vs Rivera and Rivera won.

CharlottePanther

By CharlottePanther,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

CharlottePanther Newbie

CharlottePanther

Posted
Posted

What gets lost in this most exquisite win is this game was not Rivera Vs Harbaugh. It was Rivera Vs Old Rivera and Rivera won. Who is the old Rivera you might ask? Well none other than Jim Harbaugh. During this game, it seemed as though someone cloned Rivera pre Buffalo game. You know, the "play not to lose" Rivera. The Rivera that would celebrate FGs and punt on 4th and short in the final minutes of the game, only to be let down with another loss. Yes someone kidnapped Jim Harbaugh and replaced him with pre Buffalo Bills game Ron.

So where am I going with this? Yesterday, the announcer said something during the game that caught my attention. She said "Harbaugh realizes that in this type of game, you play for points and FGs are not bad whatsoever playing a game like this against a stout D like the Panthers." I then immediatley thought, this isnt Jim Harbaugh football. This is play not to lose Rivera 1.0 football. Well, Jim Harbaugh picked a bad to have a bad day. The result? 0 attempts on 4th down, even a 4th and short in our territory which equaled 0 TDs, and 3 FGs for a total of 9 points. The result? 1 point loss.

Now ask yourself this question. If a few weeks ago Marty Mcfly came up to you from his delorean and said.. "The team that lost in this matchup was a team that scored three FGs, no TDs, blew a 9 pt lead and lost by 1 point with 0 4th down attempts." Would you have guessed in your wildest dreams that Mr Mcfly was talking about the 49ers? This was an important game for Ron. Harbaugh played Rivera 1.0 , conservative football. He lost, and Rivera has been redeemed. R.I.P Pre Buffalo Bills Ron.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mav1234 Grand Master

mav1234

Posted
Posted

didn't they only have 1 4th and short deep in our territory they didnt go for, and it was to give them a 2 score lead?  I dont recall thinking Harbaugh's calls were particularly conservative, but I may be mistaken... I was kinda giddy and shaking through two thirds of the game. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fan01 Enthusiast

Fan01

Posted
Posted

There is being aggressive and playing to win but making it a two score game when you're up 6-0 in a defensive game is the smart thing to do.  He made the right call. 

 

Going for it every time you have a chance to isn't smart football and will end up bitting in the ass just as bad as never going for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

There is being aggressive and playing to win but making it a two score game when you're up 6-0 in a defensive game is the smart thing to do. He made the right call.

Going for it every time you have a chance to isn't smart football and will end up bitting in the ass just as bad as never going for it.

Agreed. You still have to play smart situational football, and yesterday he did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
xerxes Newbie

xerxes

Posted
Posted

The fact that we had already stuffed them on 3rd and 2 and 3rd and 1 heavily influenced that decision. I thought it was a sign they were afraid of our defense.

 

That said, if they had won, 9-7 it would have been declared an excellent decision. These things are usually decided in retrospect. For example, RR deciding to punt on 4th and 2 on the SF 40ish. Ended up working out well, but if we had lost, people may have 2nd guessed that decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captroop Grand Master

Captroop

Posted
Posted

All the people that wanted Jim over Ron need to get on their knees and open their throats.

Erm, of the two, one has a NFC conference championship, the other has two losing seasons and only showed up when his ass was on the hot seat in year three.

I think people who wanted Jim still can be justified in that opinion.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • *FreeFua*
      Tight End: The Need is Bigger than We Think

      By *FreeFua* · Posted

      I’ve haven’t seen anything that says we have interest in Njoku?
    • MHS831
      Tight End: The Need is Bigger than We Think

      By MHS831 · Posted

      I think the Njoku interest revealed intent and the type of TE they want.  I really expected more from Sanders.
    • MHS831
      Defensive Tackle: The Need that Shall Not be Named

      By MHS831 · Posted

      Defensive tackle (or end in a 3-4 base) is suddenly a rather significant need.  It seems to be a forbidden topic on the Huddle.  Well I am going to unforbidden it for this thread. When we lost Robinson, it was a salary cap cutting move, saving us about $9m or so, I think.  That suggests that we are going to get cheaper, younger, and maybe, more multi-dimensional.  First, what did we lose in Robinson: (Charlotte Observer)  "Robinson co-led the team in sacks (5.5) in 2024, and he ranked second among Carolina linemen, behind Brown, in sacks (2.5) in 2025. (Derrick) Brown played on 76.4% of the Panthers’ defensive snaps last year, while Robinson played on 62.2% of those reps. No other defensive lineman played more than 38.3%, as free-agent addition, Turk Wharton, dealt with injuries throughout his first season in Carolina. Wharton played in just nine games, producing 36 total tackles and two sacks. He’s guaranteed $14 million this upcoming season. Read more at: https://www.charlotteobserver.com/sports/nfl/carolina-panthers/article314544998.html#storylink=cpy OK, about Turk Wharton.  The Observer claims that he and Bobby Brown III were to rotate into the Robinson DE position, but that is too weird for my head to comprehend.  First, Brown III is a NT by trade and Wharton weighs about 280 lbs and is not stout vs. the run.  Brown III is not going to provide the internal pass pressure; he is basically designed to take on double teams and dig in.  Wharton, on the other hand, had a PFF score in those 9 games of 40 or so.  In fairness, he was playing with injuries, but Damn.  PFF gives me a higher rating at the Golden Corral buffet.  In other words, we need a true DT who can fill the two thirds of snaps that we just released.  We can't count on Turk and Brown III is not the answer.  Cam Jackson?  Same as Brown.  Have your people do what they do best.  Furthermore, Derrick Brown probably should limit his snaps.  Playing more than 3/4 of the snaps is hard on the body.  A tired player in the trenches is more prone to lower-body injuries. We need a player who can give Derrick Brown some relief and play opposite him as well.  Turk can rotate in but he needs to shoot gaps and give Guards and tackles fits--a change of pace.   I have to think we are going to draft DT much sooner than most Huddlers realize.  My favorite, you didn't ask? Probable second-rounder Gracen Halton (No. 59 overall, according to ESPN's March 2026 update). Once considered a Day 3 sleeper, his 2026 NFL draft stock has exploded into Round 2 or 3 due to elite interior pass-rush metrics.  Projected Round: 2 (Early to Mid) Key Traits: Elite explosive, quickness, 12.2%+ pass-rush win rate, and positional versatility to play inside on passing downs. Combine Highlights: Led defensive tackles in the vertical jump (36.5”) and broad jump, per Sports Illustrated. Draft Stock: Rising fast due to consistent 2025 production (7 tackles for loss) and a "freak show" combine performance, according to Stormin in Norman.  Halton is considered a high-motor playmaker and a potential Day 2 standout, notes   I would not be surprised to see DT on day 2.  
×
×
  • Create New...