Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Playoff Picture As 2nd Seed


chknwing

Recommended Posts

As the 2nd seed of right now,

 

Carolina wont play the Saints until the Championship game if they both make it. 

 

The Saints are projected as the 6th seed and Carolina will play the NFC Wildcard winner with the highest seed.

 

Charlotte will Host either Chicago, SF, or Philly

 

If Seattle loses their playoff game and Carolina wins, the NFC Championship game will be held in Charlotte

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No real difference between the #1 and #2 seed to me. Both get a buy and if we can't end up beating the Seahawks in their own house then we don't deserve to be there anyway. Go Panthers

Did you lose your brain or something?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2. x-Carolina Panthers (11-4, 8-3 conf, 4-1 div; W 17-13 vs. Saints, at Falcons [4-10])
• Clinched a playoff berth with a win against the Saints because the 49ers and Cardinals play each other in Week 17. The Panthers lose a head-to-head tie with the Cardinals, but the Cardinals lose a tie with the 49ers, leaving Carolina to win the tie with the 49ers.
• Would clinch the South and a first-round playoff bye with a win/tie at the Falcons next week or Saints loss/tie against the Buccaneers. Would clinch the No. 1 seed if the Seahawks also lose twice and 49ers win twice.

 

 

Up to this moment...

Hawks have lost 1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...