Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Riverboat Strikes Again


Peppers90 NC

Recommended Posts

Anyone else thinking that punting at the two minute warning with only two timeouts down by three was one of the gutsiest, riskiest calls of the year?  Compare that to going for 4th and 10 a few weeks back vs Miami, similar offensive struggles during the game and this time we punt on 4th and like 6.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not really, it was pretty logical considering how well our defense had been playing. instead of giving the offense one fourth-down shot to make something happen, it's a safe bet the defense will get you the ball back and then you've got a kick return and at minimum four more shots to get into the end zone or FG range.

 

great call

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not really, it was pretty logical considering how well our defense had been playing. instead of giving the offense one fourth-down shot to make something happen, it's a safe bet the defense will get you the ball back and then you've got a kick return and at minimum four more shots to get into the end zone or FG range.

great call

It was the right call Phil you are correct in that, but it takes a man with ice in his veins and the patience of a saint to make that call. I think that more coaches would have been too frightened of Brees and Co to give the ball away in that scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think going for it was the right call, so yeah, I consider it a gamble to punt. However, I think Rivera said initially that the plan was to punt it faster so we could use the 2 minute warning as a timeout. That didn't happen because the offense took it's time coming off the field, expecting to go for it.

I just hope Rivera doesn't get in the habit of punting it in those situations and relying on the same outcome. Because had Brees converted on 3rd and we didn't get the ball back, we lose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was like Rivera played a Jedi mind trick on Payton or something.

 

Payton is one of the most aggressive coaches in the NFL (onside kick wtf?!)....and Rivera basically dared him to try to get a first down.  Payton cowered and took the ball out of his Hall-of-Fame QB's hands and we know the rest.

 

Well played Rivera. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've grown to trust Rivera's game management this season. You can say it made since because the defense had a good showing all day, but let's be real. No one would've been surprised if The Drew Breeds(as much as we hate him) would've carved us up after the punt. Everyone would've blamed RR, but I would've blamed the OL or Shula. Not even Gambit wins every bet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was a mistake and RR got lucky bc we won. The only logic in punting is if we could get the punt off prior to the two minute warning which we didn't do. Betting on the best offense in the NFL to not get a first down isn't wise. Peyton saved us bc he got ultra conservative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was a mistake and RR got lucky bc we won. The only logic in punting is if we could get the punt off prior to the two minute warning which we didn't do. Betting on the best offense in the NFL to not get a first down isn't wise. Peyton saved us bc he got ultra conservative.

 

it wasn't a mistake.

 

rivera wasn't betting on one of the best offenses in the league to not get a first down, he was betting on one of the best defenses in the league to not allow it.

 

the offense was playing like hot garbage, the defense was lights out. chances of the offense picking up the first was slim to none. they hadn't converted a 3rd down all game. punt the ball, trust the defense. if the defense holds, you then have in fact 2 chances to score...on special teams and on offense.

 

surprisingly, the offense got it's head out of it's ass and realized there was a game going on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it wasn't a mistake.

rivera wasn't betting on one of the best offenses in the league to not get a first down, he was betting on one of the best defenses in the league to not allow it.

the offense was playing like hot garbage, the defense was lights out. chances of the offense picking up the first was slim to none. they hadn't converted a 3rd down all game. punt the ball, trust the defense. if the defense holds, you then have in fact 2 chances to score...on special teams and on offense.

surprisingly, the offense got it's head out of it's ass and realized there was a game going on.

Betting on a team that has already gotten 20 first downs to not get another v the Panthers converting 77% of their 4th downs. Say what you want, but RR got lucky and he even stated in an interview he was hoping to get the punt off before the 2 minute warning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was a mistake and RR got lucky bc we won. The only logic in punting is if we could get the punt off prior to the two minute warning which we didn't do. Betting on the best offense in the NFL to not get a first down isn't wise. Peyton saved us bc he got ultra conservative.

 

I think the only reason Payton went conservative was because our offense had basically done dick all for most of the game.

 

He figured his defense would stop us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not really, it was pretty logical considering how well our defense had been playing. instead of giving the offense one fourth-down shot to make something happen, it's a safe bet the defense will get you the ball back and then you've got a kick return and at minimum four more shots to get into the end zone or FG range.

great call

No way you said that when the punt team came on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Me and you clearly have different definitions of production. If you remove the 2023 season where Thielen had just over 1k yards he is 43rd on our all time receivers list just ahead of Jonathan Mingo. And before you ask why would we remove that season? Well a couple reasons. For one thing we won a whopping 2 games. And for the biggest. Thielen was 14th in targets in 2023. We absolutely force fed him the ball all season and finished with the 32nd passing offense. For comparison sake 33 year old Jerricho Cotchery eclipsed over 1k total yards in just 2 more games and with 67 less targets than Thielen did in that 2023 season. He has above average hands. That's it. We overpaid him because we were desperate and overvalued him. That's the reality no matter how many times you or anyone else wants to quote me and get defensive about it.
    • He's played great and it was a win-win (rare free agent) for both parties.  One of the points is he hasn't made enough difference to "waste" 35 million on. Another point is by the time Panthers are hitting their prime, he would have taken snaps away from young WRs/TEs/RBs. "Thus" in the long term, hurting the teams new future "window."  But I dare think of the monkey poo of a offense the Panthers had without him the past 2 years. Lack of talent leads to many problems, including paying a 35 year old to be somewhat respectable. Hes one of few that cared enough and made a effort. Plus you know he's done great stuff in many other ways for the team, community juggernaut, leadership, etc.  Judgement is for AT and his 3 year panther career!!
    • But it has gotten a little wacky. RBs-https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/contracts/_/position/rb     A couple months ago iggles made Bark the highest guaranteed RB, jeanty was until then. That's what matters the guarantee. A rookie never played a down was the leader, until iggles howie made things right.  If a safety gets drafted in the top 8 or so, he would have the highest money too or very close to it.    Add in TEs and C too.    Even with the fixed %, the numbers are getting too much for a player that's not proven themselves.     Plus anytime a QB is drafted it screws up the contracts for players around and if next year a punter gets drafted at the same 90th spot, they want the same contract with the 5.7% increase. Teams would be laughing.    Its just reached this point. Another 10 years and I bet the vets will be crying.     
×
×
  • Create New...