Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is it just me, or do most of the FA this year other's overpriced trash


SauceBoss

Recommended Posts

For one, there are no QBs, so teams that need one will reach and overpay. The receivers we talk about are nothing special, but b/c they've been on Sportscenter or fantasy teams, their asking price will be high (Eric Decker for instance). The same can be said for corners, as a lot of names stick out that were good 4-5 years ago, but there's a reason they were cut or not re-signed, b/c they're asking too much. A lot of people might have to eat their position shortages next year and work with what they got and depend on the draft (worked for us).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, that's a lot of years.

 

Most teams tend to lock up the best guys before free agency starts if they can.  What's left over is sometimes half-decent, but some idiot team always overpays early.

 

The smart teams are the ones who sit back, wait for the market to even out, and bargain shop.  The ones who go for the big splash make big offseason headlines and get fans thumping their chests, then they disappear when the actual season starts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, that's a lot of years.

 

Most teams tend to lock up the best guys before free agency starts if they can.  What's left over is sometimes half-decent, but some idiot team always overpays early.

 

The smart teams are the ones who sit back, wait for the market to even out, and bargain shop.  The ones who go for the big splash make big offseason headlines and get fans thumping their chests, then they disappear when the actual season starts.

Like us for almost our entire existence. Your philosophy is flawed. The key is just being smart regardless of what you do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like us for almost our entire existence. Your philosophy is flawed. The key is just being smart regardless of what you do.

It hasn't been the philosophy that was flawed. It's been the execution.

Gettleman may have taken a similar approach to free agency as Hurney in the timing aspect, but it's clear he knew what he was doing in a way that Hurney never did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It hasn't been the philosophy that was flawed. It's been the execution.

Gettleman may have taken a similar approach to free agency as Hurney in the timing aspect, but it's clear he knew what he was doing in a way that Hurney never did.

It's the difference between a scout and a sportswriter making the decisions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It hasn't been the philosophy that was flawed. It's been the execution.

Gettleman may have taken a similar approach to free agency as Hurney in the timing aspect, but it's clear he knew what he was doing in a way that Hurney never did.

It's sort of my point. It's more about the GM than sticking with a certain philosophy. If you have a GM that knows what he's doing, he can sit back and wait or go ahead and get the guys he needs. If you have a GM that doesn't know what he's doing, you have guys like Hurney that sit back and wait but hurt your team. And guys like Snyder than sign everyone regardless and still suck. You can go ahead and sign early as long as you sign the right guys. You don't have to sit back and wait while guys that can help your team get picked up just so you can pride yourself in sticking with your philosophy like Hurney did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...