Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What the Mike Mitchell signing says to the league


Zod

Recommended Posts

Are you a veteran defensive player that needs a fresh start? Go play on the Panthers for a year on the cheap, and you will cash in the year after.

All in all, not a bad deal for us.

Sent from the Carolina Huddle App

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shows to go ya, Good coaching can mean the world to players. Rivera took a perceived under performer and turned him into a viable Safety.

But by all means. Let's get rid of Rivera. (Sarcasm) And I hate having to qualify that statement in order to keep the wolves at bay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Mitchell, but I just don't see him being as good as he was here. We have a pretty good history at making unspectacular rental safeties look great. Marlon McCree? Chris Harris? There's one more that played for us for like a year or two that shined on our squad and fizzled out on his new team. As I type this, I'm scratching my head as to why we can't make Godfrey look great...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He got overpaid so it's whatever.

 

But I do wonder if, given his success in SD and now Carolina, Rivera and company feel as if they can put whoever in the secondary and have the "system" make the player.  This obviously requires a great pass rush which we seem to be intent on keeping.

 

I know we haven't been known as team with a "system" that players can be inserted into but.....worth thinking about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...