Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do you beat your pet for discipline?


Happy Panther

Recommended Posts

My wife set a standard of only positive discipline which I have no major problem with. FWIW we do not spank our children.

 

My neighbor has a golden and will definitely give it a whack if it is doing something she knows she shouldn't. She is generally well behaved and well adjusted

 

What is your view?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I grew up with lots of goldens and german shephards. They all responded just fine to raised voices - generally speaking, both of those breeds do not like to disappoint humans and seem to respond fine to shame and lack of attention. Never felt the need to be physically aggressive. All were rescues - never had the experience of trying to discipline a puppy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me it depends on the dog.  My mutt (beagle and something else) is smart and well mannered and I've never really have to get onto him. My pit however is extremely stubborn and hyper, if she doesn't get her exercise sometimes she acts out and I have to get onto her.  Yelling and gesturing usually suffices but on occasion I do have to pop her with the belt.  It's always a last resort for me.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think beating your pet will develop bad tendencies later, such as aggression towards other people and animals.

 

 

 

From my experience, you need to establish that you are the "pack leader". When my dog was about 6 months old, he got off the leash  and took off down my street in a dead sprint. I caught him about 30 yards later, picked him up and pinned him on the ground (he was about 50 pounds), all the while scolding him.  If he ever was acting up, I could just physically over power and hold him down, while saying "bad boy" and things like that.

 

 

 

I don't think beating or inflicting pain does a bit of good.

 

It's all about establishing what is acceptable from your dog. Now if I even speak in a certain tone, my dog will cower and slink away. No physical interaction necessary.

 

 

 

Another way to avoid bad behavior is to constatnly reward good behavior. Buy a bag of training treats from petsmart and periodically give them a treat for listening.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Had an English, wonderful dogs, but are pretty bullheaded/stubborn.

 

Sometimes I would have to pop him on the rear or the nose to get his attention as a puppy (until about 3/4 years old), but it was rare.

 

They are not "pleasers" they beat to their drums a little differently than a lab or golden type dog.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My two dogs are my first dogs in my "adult" life (had to quote adult since I'm not 100% sure what that means) and I decided not to ever hit them. Like someone mentioned before, I use a raised voice and make eye contact with them when I am disciplining them and they respond great to me. If they're in trouble I typically call them to come and sit in front of me and I'll say something like "what is this" or "who did this" or just "no" and they know they're in trouble. Sometimes I will also put my finger on their head and/or neck while doing this and they submit to the discipline.  After I'm done yelling at them I always tell them "free" and they go back to being dogs again and usually want a hug. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On another note....one of my friends is a professional dog trainer (e-collar trainer) and if you really want to enjoy your dogs I would suggest looking into this kind of training and spend the money on it. He worked with my dogs 3 or 4 times and they're the most well behaved dogs I've ever had. I can take them anywhere (park, doggy daycare, a shopping center, a bar) off the leash and they are always under my voice control. I jog with them and one is trained to run/walk on my right side and the other on my left. I worked with them on the commands quite a bit and after about 4 months I didn't even need to use the collars anymore. I'm telling you...I would spend that money 100 times again to have well behaved dogs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...