All Activity

Did you use an AI to generate this?

Fortner is an experienced 3rd round pick from SEC who has played pretty well. Why exoect a late rounder small school rookie to beat him out?

#Panthers Luke Fortner: one year, $2.75M, $825K signing bonus, $1.325M fully gtd, salary $1.215M https://x.com/aaronwilson_nfl/status/2033511565933072710?s=46&t=xeIgh_-Vr2aKxBkBJdfnKA

Whenever the Panthers have had deep runs they've had great tight ends. That's why. KC- great tight end. NE with Brady- great tight end. Pretty much most of your high end teams have meaningful production at the TE spot. I'm not opposed to it.

I am about to put him a tier below Ozzie Newsome / John Lynch when it comes to players turned GMs... this guy is GOOD!

I'd agree his business but that's kind of the problem with sharing your personal growth journey for BetterHelp ads

While we might not like the quality of some of the depth, we can now go into the draft without our hands tied.

Maybe right there with the 5-4 win over the same team on Feb 26.

Here's our transactions.

Funny enough his pro comp on NFL.com is Carlos Dunlap.

I actually think we’re on the few teams I’d consider for drafting Faulk. His lack of pass rushing productivity gives me reservations for a 4-3 edge. I’ve heard draft guys say some of it was scheme n his job to occupy blockers to free up LBs or whatever. But he hasn’t shown me enough to be a first round edge as a pass rusher. Buts he’s 6’6 280 with long arms and stout against the run. And he’s young and could add size. Think there’s room for him to be a strong fit in an odd front. Not sure he’s my first choice. But I wouldn’t hate it.

From NFL Reporter Matt Lombardo: "The NFL's Biggest Free Agency Winners, according to executives who know" https://bsky.app/profile/mattlombardo.bsky.social/post/3mh6bozlgbc2x

He had quite the interview on Cam Newton’s podcast Cam was kind to him Why, I don’t know smith has issues…then again, who doesn’t…

That is what it seemed like at the time.

Oh don't get me wrong all of our smurfs will drive the net, its just in the playoffs were physicality ramps up you can't make up for being outweighed by 40+ pounds and give up 5+ inches in height with "grit" and "gumption" for the playoffs I'd honestly be tempted to have Stanky back on the wing, have Janakowski man the 2c and KK the fourth line.... (Janakowski has been productive for his very limited TOI) and tbh Stankoven has 30 points in 63 games played averaging 16.5 minutes of ice time, Janakowski has 16 in 53 games averaging just a shade over 9 minutes of ice time, Stanky has spent almost 3x as much time on the ice for less than double the production, and he doesn't provide the same size

Remember Stef Noesen? Best net front the Canes have had in the last 10 years. Once told Tripp that none of his goals would make highlight reels because they all happen within 3 feet of the net.

At the time, I remember thinking Luke was a great player but a luxury pick. LOL, WTF did I know.

I was explaining this very fact to my wife Friday afternoon! She gave zero fugs.

Sonny Styles raved about his interview with Dan Morgan at the combine. It's too bad he won't be there at 19.

#Panthers Luke Fortner: one year, $2.75M, $825K signing bonus, $1.325M fully gtd, salary $1.215M

Give me Michael Malone

Ah yes a typical Bryce Young Defense Force post. No mention of the reigning Rookie of the Year or the #1 highest paid OL in the league two years in a row. Yes clearly our QB just needs All Pros at every position. We'll get right on that.

Should have put under dog bets on immediately apparently, numbers continue to drop, maybe play is money line favorites but I have been trying to figure out the best round robin set up for dogs. Right now I'm thinking 3 leg 12s and 15s, 2 leg 13s and 14s. It looks like it is slightly profitable with the lowest odds teams winning but what you'd really be hoping for would be 1 15 and 1 14 winning

Saw Darryl Dawkins play in the old Boston Garden with Philly and Dr J vs Larry Bird in his rookie year. Playoffs game. He was a physical specimen. Massive.