Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Which RB is the first out the door?


Ruff

  

128 members have voted

  1. 1. Which RB is the first out the door?

    • Stewart
      27
    • Williams
      54
    • Barner
      40
    • Tolbert
      1
    • Gaffney
      6


Recommended Posts

I think that JStew is donezo. Tolbert proved last year that he could fill both the FB position and JStew's role. When he was on This Is Gross, I was taken aback by the way he mentioned that he won't do anything to further injure his body if he's hurt. He seemed to be very... unrushed? I think that Gettleman will eventually send a message by cutting him, though I could see DWill being cut since Barner has had a year to develop.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gettleman said that Kenjon Barner  would essentially be a 2014 draft pick because he did not get as much opportunities to play and it would be unfair to judge him. So codeword: " I am waiting for the right opportunity to cut JStew or Dwill when it will no longer hurt our cap".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't cut Deangelo. He's our most proven RB with Tolbert. As much as its going to assault our Salary Cap, I have a feeling it's going to be Stewart. Hate it because he is so tantalizing when he's healthy (once a decade?).

It makes sense for all the ring reasons. He's only 27 with very low milage. When healthy(CEVAT!), he is a powerful battering ram and a speedy slasher with great hands out of the backfield. It's been 3 years or so since he was that healthy. I feel like despite the cap ramifications, he's going to go to send a message to all the other high priced players we have.

So sacred cows here.

Sent from my VS980 4G using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't cut Deangelo. He's our most proven RB with Tolbert. As much as its going to assault our Salary Cap, I have a feeling it's going to be Stewart. Hate it because he is so tantalizing when he's healthy (once a decade?).

It makes sense for all the ring reasons. He's only 27 with very low milage. When healthy(CEVAT!), he is a powerful battering ram and a speedy slasher with great hands out of the backfield. It's been 3 years or so since he was that healthy. I feel like, despite the cap ramifications, he's going to go to send a message to all the other high priced players we have.

No sacred cows here.

Sent from my VS980 4G using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

J

Sent from my VS980 4G using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Barner is not a bust because he is a 6th rounder. 6th rounders aren't really busts. He isn't a special talent either. I'm not sure why everyone is so high on the kid, he hasn't shown anything worthy of the attention or fanfare that so many on the huddle seem to give him. 

 

At least Gettis put up a couple 100 yard games a few years back. there was reason to have hope with him. Barner has done nothing. Truth be told, I'd rather have Gaffney on the roster than Barner. Gaffney can pass protect and doesn't look like he goes down the first time someone breathes at him. Barner's college tape was not impressive to me. At all. I have no idea why we drafted him to begin with. I truly believe he was a product of the Oregon system. To think he is the heir apparent to D-Will or Stewart is ridiculous to me. Hell, I'm not even calling Gaffney the Heir apparent, for all we know he's just camp fodder, he was only a 6th round pick. From what I saw though, I like him better than Barner. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
    • You can go back to the New York Knicks somehow getting Patrick Ewing.  I saw a story where they place the New York Knick card in the freezer right before the drawing.  It was simple.  Show everyone the cards are undetectable to the human eye.  All they had to do was grab the coldest card. IMO ever since Goodell took over the NFL it has been fishy.  Patriots winning the SB after 9/11, New Orleans after Katrina and Peyton Manning's going away gift against us. The terrible calls during that game were blatantly one sided.  New England should have been stripped of their first 3 SB when they were caught spying on the other team in their SB wins.  I think the evidence against the Patriots was so damning Goodell felt it could ruin football and they brushed it under the table.   In the 2004 SB, How did we go from practically no yards in the first Quarter to setting a record in the 3rd Qtr.  Dan Henning changes the game plan.  IMO probably the greatest half time adjustment of all time.  
×
×
  • Create New...