Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Focusing on the game at hand


saX man

Recommended Posts

We've got Mike Evans who has been killing it as of late and a team that's showing fight despite a terrible record and god awful city to call home playing us.    

 

Norman, Bene, & Trae, killed it last week and Harper played surprisingly great.  Can they continue against an offense that has seemed to pick up life?  CJ is a big part of this.  He's not putting up the sack stats but his play is causing much disruption and McCown/McNown/whoever is a pretty vulnerable QB.  

 

What do we need to do to kick the living piss out of these bottom feeders?  

 

--

 

Without CJN, we've got DA at the helm with the usual suspects.  Who goes nuts? Who is Rivera-style mediocre?

 

 

No accident reports in here, game talk on a crazy Tuesday evening.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look for Benjamin to have a big game.  Anderson and KB seem to click the last time they played.

They definitely did.  It helped KB get off to a really solid roll this season.  

 

I think Verner is overrated as hell so wanna see him torched by our squad.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regardless of who's at QB for the game, we can win based on defense play and the correct offensive mentality... Give the ball to Stewart 25+ times. Whether Cam or DA is at QB, our game plan should be built around Stewart. He would easily run over them. 25+ carries and he'd get 200+ yards, I guarantee it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regardless of who's at QB for the game, we can win based on defense play and the correct offensive mentality... Give the ball to Stewart 25+ times. Whether Cam or DA is at QB, our game plan should be built around Stewart. He would easily run over them. 25+ carries and he'd get 200+ yards, I guarantee it.

qq

That would mean that Stewart would alone get over 100 yards more than Tampa is giving up per game. They are 16th against the run and 24th against the pass. They give up,115 on the ground and 249 in the air. Almost identical to us.

Then again carry on with the fantasy there is little said on this message board that would qualify as factual lately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would be happy with Lomu or Iheanachor at 19. Fano is intriguing but I don't think he makes it.
    • II see it this way: We have to look at long-term needs and current depth.  We have filled some key spots with players on one-year contracts.  I firmly believe that they intend to pay Bryce some big bucks next year.  That means you cannot hope that your rookies in 2027 can fill the spots vacated by the veterans you could not afford to re-sign.   We need to consider the cap and the fact that the need to start a rookie is not viewed as a positive by coaches and general managers, but they value first contracts--so it is a delicate balance. I think they have to look at the cap by position--"Can we afford a $50m QB and a $100m OL?  That is half the cap, before you pay your WRs and RBs and TEs.  They need to start getting younger on the OL as well.   I am not suggesting that we draft OT in round 1, but we could and I would get it.  RT on a 1-year deal, they may have intel about Ickey (who was not the best LT, to be honest) and 32-year old Moton is on a bad wheel.   Now if you go by Morgan's history, you can almost tell what position we are going to address with the first pick by noting the positions he has not focused on in free agency.  DT, considering the lack of performance by those not named Derrick Brown and the loss of Robinson, is screaming to be addressed with a top player.  Wharton is not an early down DT (DE if you want to get technical) and our LBs need to be clean--they were not in 2025.  Look for a DT early. I also think we will address ILB (pass covering Will) on day 2.  The other day 2 pick will be an OT, in my view. Do not rule out CB.  We are thin there too, and Jackson is in his final year.  I am not sure that we love Smith-Wade.  Some crackhead on here talked about moving him to S----stay tuned.   Hopefully, a team wanting Ty Simpson will move up and offer us a pick or two to move back. DT WILB OT OC QB  (you heard it here 337th--but this pick could come sooner than you think.      
    • Bryce had some bad games, but he had some good ones as well (and this is coming from a Bryce skeptic). I think it's a little simplistic to put all the offensive woes on Bryce, you also should be looking at O-line play, receiver play, RB and TE play, and also coaching. There's no way when I look at the offense in it's totality am I ready to say that a so-so to bad offense was all on Bryce, and, I also can't say that we don't need to upgrade any position on offense, save Tetairoa McMillan (who also wasn't perfect) and maybe the starting guards and T-mo.
×
×
  • Create New...