Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Julio drowned in Lake Norman

SCP

By SCP,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

SCP Enthusiast

SCP

Posted
Posted

@CarPanthersNews: Julio Jones finished with 58 yards and 59 yards in his 2 games against the Panthers (2nd and 3rd lowest totals respectively). S/O to @J_No24

Props to @NickTheSlick12 on Twitter the other day for "Lake Norman".

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dex Collaborator

Dex

Posted
Posted

@CarPanthersNews: Julio Jones finished with 58 yards and 59 yards in his 2 games against the Panthers (2nd and 3rd lowest totals respectively). S/O to @J_No24

Props to @NickTheSlick12 on Twitter the other day for "Lake Norman".

I actually called Josh "Lake Norman" on Jeremy's podcast a while ago. :(
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Montsta Rising Star

Montsta

Posted
Posted

@CarPanthersNews: Julio Jones finished with 58 yards and 59 yards in his 2 games against the Panthers (2nd and 3rd lowest totals respectively). S/O to @J_No24

Props to @NickTheSlick12 on Twitter the other day for "Lake Norman".

If we can pull a transcript of the draft day chat room when Norman was drafted, I called him Lake Norman then in light of Revis Island being a big thing at that time.

So, Internet high fives all around please.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted

Well, in Julio's defense, its rather hard to catch any passes when your quarterback is being hit on virtually every play. That being said, the secondary did a outstanding job all around yesterday.

I was at the game and I'm telling you there were a lot of coverage sacks and pressure happening...

Norman is balling out right now.. He was so far in Julie's grill that one play he threw Norman down and still couldn't get open. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SCP Enthusiast

SCP

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Lake Norman is a terrible nickname. How is a lake tough? It's big, wide, flat, boring.

Herp derp ... we have a lake named Norman here! That's Josh's nickname!

I hope it didn't go down like that.

A lake is not tough but an island is? An island cannot exist without a body of water surrounding it. Lake Wylie is full of bacteria and disease, that screams tough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • HaricotVert
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...