Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who thinks we'll actually beat Seattle on Saturday?


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

What's your gameplan to victory? Any reasons besides how "we're due" or "we're a team of destiny" or "I have a feeling"?

 

I think we lose 31-13, similar to the Sunday Night Football game in New Orleans last year. We've improved and we've had a successful season where I can see us making a Super Bowl run next year, but at the end of the day, we still have Byron Bell at LT and presumably Brenton Bersin at punt returner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a hope...using logical arguments with that hope....we're going to have to do what we haven't all year and not have any turnovers on offense, no lapses on ST, and no big plays given up on defense.  That hasn't happened in a single game yet, so the only thing to say for that is maybe this is the game, finally.  Maybe all the wheels finally click and we go over the hump.

 

I have hope, but logically, we're going to have to fire on absolutely every cylinder and if we do win, I worry this'll be like the Chicago game in 05 where we expend so much energy and get beaten up so much we won't have anything left for the next round.

 

But we're in, and until we're out, we have a chance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said 17-13. And I don't know who scores either. I'm thinking we go up 7-0 early in the game as usual, Seattle goes down and kicks a FG, we punt, they punt, we punt, they punt, we punt, they fumble, we score a TD, then Bersin fumbles, They score a TD, then Cam fumbles, they kick a FG, we run the clock down and kick a FG with 16 seconds left and win.

 

Or none of that happens and Seattle scores 17.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the record shows it will be a low scoring ball game.  I don't expect them to come close

to 30 points.

 

Our last three games against them we've lost by 4 or 5 points...we can beat them and we're due.

 

Two things....we could have beat San Fran last year but we made dumb mistakes and penalties.

 

We beat Arizona but made dumb mistakes and Cam didn't have a good game.

 

If Cam plays well, we have more than a chance.  I was hoping for a little less sloppy game Saturday,

meaning we learned our lesson from last year.  I'm 50/50 right now, but I certainly think we can beat them, even on the road..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said this in a post earlier. We will have to play the most consistent football we've ever played. We have to catch every ball, throw it accurately. Defensively we need to play as sound/disciplined as we've played all year.

 

I think we can, but the stars would need to be aligned. I don't want to make predictions, but I would say if we play our best game we can win....... I think we have about a 30% chance of that happening. Just not enough speed to get it done on offense, while at the same time, holding them to a lower point total. Similar to all the other games we've played against them, similar outcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...