Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF ranks teams by number of "missing pieces" from being a super bowl contending team


Recommended Posts

This thing is bologna. Going through looking at other teams and ours, their evaluation of players seems off. Desean jackson is one, he is rated as just good for washington. I believe he js elite but maybe his stats dont show it, his qb level is poor. Stats alone doesnt properly grade players. And they have a few players rated average on our squad that i think are far from that. But what do i know? Still pretty cool thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thing is bologna. Going through looking at other teams and ours, their evaluation of players seems off. Desean jackson is one, he is rated as just good for washington. I believe he js elite but maybe his stats dont show it, his qb level is poor. Stats alone doesnt properly grade players. And they have a few players rated average on our squad that i think are far from that. But what do i know? Still pretty cool thought.

 

they actually mentioned in deseans section that he is an elite player but qb play was a factor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Olsen ran a 4.51 at the combine when he came into the league.. that was better than what Graham and gronk ran at their combines. TE isn't a fast position. It's a "block well and catch the ball when your number is called" position. Olsen is absolutely elite

Yeh Olsen is probably the most underrated tightend in the league.

Hes the same size as Cam, runs a 4.5. I have rarely seen him drop. I think most sites credit him with 2-4 for the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PFF grades should kind of be taken with a grain of salt.  A tackle that loses a battle to an undrafted rookie is graded the same as a one that looses a battle to JJ Watt.  It's like a +1 or -1 no matter who you are playing against. 

 

Also some of the coverage grades are kind of questionable. A LB or CB or S that picks up a receiver that was not his responsibility,  but no one else picked him up gets graded down for allowing the catch.  But he was picking up for someone elses mistake.  So should he be?  

 

All I am saying is PFF is a good base line to grade someone but its not like its the bible or something. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Olsen ran a 4.51 at the combine when he came into the league.. that was better than what Graham and gronk ran at their combines. TE isn't a fast position. It's a "block well and catch the ball when your number is called" position. Olsen is absolutely elite

 

He must've gotten the jump on the gun, or 4.51 is "slow," because he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

YAC make WRs elite, not TEs. Sure, it's nice, but not really the expected for TEs in order to be considered elite

 

Jimmy Graham is elite. Olsen has great hands, but Jimmy Graham, he is not.

 

So, I guess for TEs, there's "elite" (aka, NORMAL limitations), and then there's super-elite Jimmy Graham.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...