Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bill Voth's chat with Gettleman Part 3: On the offense


Nick_81

Recommended Posts

Thanks for sharing man.

I believe Gettleman when he says that we'll get there. 45-7 panther wins are in our future. Just gotta get the personell in now.

We are literally building our team just like the seahawks imo. Except we will be tougher and stronger at the point of attack on both lines and we have a QB who can do much more and put the team on his back and carry us.

I feel like we are 40% the way there as far as personell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is just what I have been telling everyone that constantly criticizes Shula.  Shula runs the system that both Gettleman and Rivera want.  When he has the players to run his system, he can be successful.  When he doesnt we struggle.  For those on Shula's nuts about poor playcalling, consider being an Eagle's fan or a Saint's fan.  Because as long as Gettleman is here, our current offense is the kind of offense you can expect.

 

Sits back while the bitching and whining continues despite the fact that Gettleman said it isn't going to change and the goal is to give Shula and Cam more weapons to work,not making changes to the system or philosophy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remmers got beat like a drum against the Seahawks.

 

I'll give him props for coming in and doing better than Chandler, but we shouldn't be completely content like our RT problem is solved.  I hope Remmers can be the guy, but I'd keep options open.

 

Lots of RT's got beat like a drum by Seattle.  He aint dancing to canton, but he should be able to keep Cam upright.  We have to make Cam comfortable that his blind side isnt gonna get him killed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • From what i see, Canales offense requires a QB that is willing to take chances to maximize the offense. XL is also the kind of receiver that needs a qb to be risky to bring out his full potential. Its just a matter of if Bryce is gonna be that QB.
    • Baker just played how Baker played.... everywhere but here. He is a risk taking gunslinger.  Always has been.  And last year was asked to be what he was.   Geno Smith was the best deep ball passer in the NFL his comeback season.  Wasn't even close that year.  Again, that's the type passer Canales has always been around in the offenses he has been part of.  The pass game that compliments the stubborn run is the deep chunk play pass game.   And that was his first investment with XL.  My continued point, is the same as going into last season.  It's a bad marriage going in.  The QB doesn't fit the scheme.  Again.  Carrol/Fox/Ron....all paired up their boring football with risk taking QBs.  And again, I'm fine if that is where we are going.  It's not my preference but that's not my argument.  I'm saying if we are doing that, we need a QB that matches it.     
    • I guess you missed the point. His rushing attack was dead last yet his team still performed. That’s not Fox/Rivera ball. His QB also had a career year. Remember the same QB that played for us in the same division and was so bad he was cut?  Carroll coached after Lynch as well. In fact Canales was more involved in the more recent offense with Geno Smith and a good rushing attack. People are taking him wanting a rushing attack and assuming that means we are shutting down our passing attack. Again many of the top offenses like SF, Miami, and Detroit featured strong rushing attacks. 
×
×
  • Create New...