Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Shaq Thompson In The First?


Jeremy Igo
 Share

Recommended Posts

I wouldn't be mad, but I'd rather have Jaelen Strong or Eric Fisher.  May be a moot point though.  No telling who may or may not still be on the board at #25.  All three could be gone or all three could still be there.

 

I've seen you mention Eric Fisher a few times now...do you mean Ereck Flowers or Jake Fisher?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jake Fisher.  I have no clue why I keep calling him Eric.

 

Ha no worries.  Yeah Fisher seems to be on the rise.  Kind of reminds me a bit of Lane Johnson from a few years back. Not a 4th overall pick (Because he was inconsistent at times apparently) but both are around the same size, were TE converts, and owned the shuttle drill. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shaq Thompson is a lot faster then his 40 time at the combine and his pro day will show that. Same thing happened to TD

 

TD said in a recent interview that he didn't prepare for the 40 at the combine and knew nothing about the technique, etc., which was why he timed slow.

 

The same is likely NOT true with Shaq Thompson. The combine is a different beast now than it was when TD was drafted, and these kids prepare much better for the 40 because they know that's where they get all the attention (good or bad). Based on that, I'm not buying that his speed is comparable to TDs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thompson said a couple weeks back that he's "a LB and a LB alone."

So he doesn't have much value for us.

 

Pretty much this. If we draft him to play LB, how many snaps does he realistically see? We play sub packages more than base, and I just don't see taking out the best coverage LB in the game (TD) from our Nickel package for a greenhorn rookie.

 

So, we're looking at a couple years before he gets enough snaps to make him worth a 1st round pick, and if that's the situation we're looking at, we might as well take a mid-round OLB to groom and spend our 1st on a higher impact/value position.

Edited by WUnderhill
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty much this. If we draft him to play LB, how many snaps does he realistically see? We play sub packages more than base, and I just don't see taking out the best coverage LB in the game (TD) from our Nickel package for a greenhorn rookie.

So, we're looking at a couple years before he gets enough snaps to make him worth a 1st round pick, and if that's the situation we're looking at, we might as well take a mid-round OLB to groom and spend our 1st on a higher impact/value position.

Agreed. He's not going to get snaps over TD at the Sam, and the Will plays only sparingly in our defense anyways. You can find LBs all over the draft anyways and I'd rather do that than pick up one whose going to sit for a couple years and not contribute. The team has too many needs and is in a good position to address one of them at 25. Can't afford this kind of luxury pick.

If he were willing to convert it might be a different story, but even then it'd still be a position he'd have to learn meaning we aren't going to see an immediate impact.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...