Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Shaq Thompson In The First?


Jeremy Igo
 Share

Recommended Posts

I wouldn't be mad, but I'd rather have Jaelen Strong or Eric Fisher.  May be a moot point though.  No telling who may or may not still be on the board at #25.  All three could be gone or all three could still be there.

 

I've seen you mention Eric Fisher a few times now...do you mean Ereck Flowers or Jake Fisher?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jake Fisher.  I have no clue why I keep calling him Eric.

 

Ha no worries.  Yeah Fisher seems to be on the rise.  Kind of reminds me a bit of Lane Johnson from a few years back. Not a 4th overall pick (Because he was inconsistent at times apparently) but both are around the same size, were TE converts, and owned the shuttle drill. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shaq Thompson is a lot faster then his 40 time at the combine and his pro day will show that. Same thing happened to TD

 

TD said in a recent interview that he didn't prepare for the 40 at the combine and knew nothing about the technique, etc., which was why he timed slow.

 

The same is likely NOT true with Shaq Thompson. The combine is a different beast now than it was when TD was drafted, and these kids prepare much better for the 40 because they know that's where they get all the attention (good or bad). Based on that, I'm not buying that his speed is comparable to TDs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thompson said a couple weeks back that he's "a LB and a LB alone."

So he doesn't have much value for us.

 

Pretty much this. If we draft him to play LB, how many snaps does he realistically see? We play sub packages more than base, and I just don't see taking out the best coverage LB in the game (TD) from our Nickel package for a greenhorn rookie.

 

So, we're looking at a couple years before he gets enough snaps to make him worth a 1st round pick, and if that's the situation we're looking at, we might as well take a mid-round OLB to groom and spend our 1st on a higher impact/value position.

Edited by WUnderhill
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty much this. If we draft him to play LB, how many snaps does he realistically see? We play sub packages more than base, and I just don't see taking out the best coverage LB in the game (TD) from our Nickel package for a greenhorn rookie.

So, we're looking at a couple years before he gets enough snaps to make him worth a 1st round pick, and if that's the situation we're looking at, we might as well take a mid-round OLB to groom and spend our 1st on a higher impact/value position.

Agreed. He's not going to get snaps over TD at the Sam, and the Will plays only sparingly in our defense anyways. You can find LBs all over the draft anyways and I'd rather do that than pick up one whose going to sit for a couple years and not contribute. The team has too many needs and is in a good position to address one of them at 25. Can't afford this kind of luxury pick.

If he were willing to convert it might be a different story, but even then it'd still be a position he'd have to learn meaning we aren't going to see an immediate impact.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How am I all over the place?  I'm still saying that. I'm saying that Chark at his best and T-Mac right now, on the same team right now for the 2025 season, T-Mac would be ahead of him on the depth chart Week 1. Because in the same way everyone is saying, "T-Mac hasn't played a snap in the NFL yet", the very same is true to say, "nothing Chark did in his past matters moving forward" His peak was a 1,008 yard season where he was the only decent WR on a terrible team.  He didn't put up the 1k yard season because he was a great WR, it was because of how bad the rest of them on the team were. His stats aren't the same as his ability, and his ability was never all that good to begin with. Hell, most of this board agrees that T-Mac is our #1 right now, even if Thielen is Bryce's #1 option early in the saeson just because of the comfort level there, he's still just a slot safety valve and T-Mac is our #1. If you put peak Chark on the roster RIGHT NOW (even without T-Mac)... is anyone even putting him over Thielen, XL, or Coker going into this season? I'm honestly not sure many of us would consider him as such, because even at his best, he was just a JAG.  So if the same people who are okay with T-Mac being ahead of those guys right now, wouldn't put Chark above them, how can you in the same breath say Chark was better than T-Mac already is now?
    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
×
×
  • Create New...