Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Best QB after Rodgers? Who's #2?


mbarbour21

Recommended Posts

Well according to this article, it's between Brady......and Luck. Wow, I know they have a thing for neck beard.....but wow. Not only do they entertain the fact Luck is better than Brady, but many actually pick Luck as #2 behind Rodgers. That seems very insulting to a four-time Super Bowl Champion......but what do I know?

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000474557/article/tom-brady-or-andrew-luck-best-qb-after-mvp-aaron-rodgers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well according to this article, it's between Brady......and Luck. Wow, I know they have a thing for neck beard.....but wow. Not only do they entertain the fact Luck is better than Brady, but many actually pick Luck as #2 behind Rodgers. That seems very insulting to a four-time Super Bowl Champion......but what do I know?

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000474557/article/tom-brady-or-andrew-luck-best-qb-after-mvp-aaron-rodgers

Id say either Phillip Rivers or Andrew Luck tbh. I watch a lot of other games throughout the year with sunday tickets shortcuts (it's the whole game but they cut literally everything between plays so the games are 30 mins a piece) They take over games for their teams a lot of the time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After that performance in the playoffs, they could at least wait for Luck to play another game to redeem himself. It's apparent that they are just marketing Luck to be the face of the league. They don't seem to like the faces that have been coming out the last few years. Like Bridgewater and Winston. So they're just rushing to throne him before the inevitable.

Why would either of them be the face of the league over Luck? One has a 6-6 career record and the other has yet to take a snap
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well according to this article, it's between Brady......and Luck. Wow, I know they have a thing for neck beard.....but wow. Not only do they entertain the fact Luck is better than Brady, but many actually pick Luck as #2 behind Rodgers. That seems very insulting to a four-time Super Bowl Champion......but what do I know?

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000474557/article/tom-brady-or-andrew-luck-best-qb-after-mvp-aaron-rodgers

 

Better now, Brady, and I may take him over Rodgers for one season.

 

 

To start a franchise, Rodgers, Luck, Rivers, Cam, in that order probably, Rivers is getting long in the tooth, but the dude can play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder why the media is not as obsessed about who the best player in the NBA is as it is in fall. hmm!

Oh, Eureka! They can't claim Ricky Rubio is the best.

It couldn't possibly be because the NBA only generates 60% of the revenue of the NFL (and 70% of MLB for that matter) or that the average 2014 NBA Championship series only had 1/3 the TV ratings of the friggin' NFL DRAFT, meaning that far fewer Americans are interested and/or emotionally invested in pro basketball. That couldn't be it at all.

Your schtick is so tired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder why the media is not as obsessed about who the best player in the NBA is as it is in fall. hmm!

 

Oh, Eureka! They can't claim Ricky Rubio is the best.

 

 

Err I hear them argue it all the time...? Between Lebro, Rose, Durant, Westbrook etc. Even more so with the GOAT between Jordan, Kobe, Lebron etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • i think the difference is that we win when we minimize Bryce as part of the offense ala Trent dilfer. look at the games we win and he us always under 200 yards passing. 
    • Which is also why we talk about there being a lower ceiling for Bryce I think Bryce sees the game decently well already given the mess this offence has been for the better part of his career. His big WTF plays are typically him just dropping the damn ball Which leaves me wondering sometimes what does peak Bryce look like. Guys like Sam you’d watch in NY/Carolina and he’d have so many boneheaded plays that you were left thinking if he could just clean these up you’d have a solid QB. And now we’re finally seeing Sam in a good offence and he’s able to play with timing and within structure and those boneheaded plays are cut down to 2-3 times a game Bryce doesn’t have a ton of boneheaded plays (minus flat out dropping the ball) so I dunno. I think Bryce can be a solid QB. Put Bryce in Seattle or Tampa and they’re still winning a lot of games  Coaching and overall team matters so much. The only dude that I think could probably do the most with the least in this league would be Lamar 
    • They both struggle with that but Lawrence is a significantly better athlete and an INSANELY more physically gifted passer. He has very limited reasons to be struggling the way he has. I will say, when he came into the league I specifically remember an interview that he basically intimated that he would be okay if his life didn't involve football and I have always questioned if he was passionate enough to be elite from that moment onward.
×
×
  • Create New...