Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Best QB after Rodgers? Who's #2?


mbarbour21

Recommended Posts

Well according to this article, it's between Brady......and Luck. Wow, I know they have a thing for neck beard.....but wow. Not only do they entertain the fact Luck is better than Brady, but many actually pick Luck as #2 behind Rodgers. That seems very insulting to a four-time Super Bowl Champion......but what do I know?

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000474557/article/tom-brady-or-andrew-luck-best-qb-after-mvp-aaron-rodgers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well according to this article, it's between Brady......and Luck. Wow, I know they have a thing for neck beard.....but wow. Not only do they entertain the fact Luck is better than Brady, but many actually pick Luck as #2 behind Rodgers. That seems very insulting to a four-time Super Bowl Champion......but what do I know?

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000474557/article/tom-brady-or-andrew-luck-best-qb-after-mvp-aaron-rodgers

Id say either Phillip Rivers or Andrew Luck tbh. I watch a lot of other games throughout the year with sunday tickets shortcuts (it's the whole game but they cut literally everything between plays so the games are 30 mins a piece) They take over games for their teams a lot of the time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After that performance in the playoffs, they could at least wait for Luck to play another game to redeem himself. It's apparent that they are just marketing Luck to be the face of the league. They don't seem to like the faces that have been coming out the last few years. Like Bridgewater and Winston. So they're just rushing to throne him before the inevitable.

Why would either of them be the face of the league over Luck? One has a 6-6 career record and the other has yet to take a snap
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well according to this article, it's between Brady......and Luck. Wow, I know they have a thing for neck beard.....but wow. Not only do they entertain the fact Luck is better than Brady, but many actually pick Luck as #2 behind Rodgers. That seems very insulting to a four-time Super Bowl Champion......but what do I know?

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000474557/article/tom-brady-or-andrew-luck-best-qb-after-mvp-aaron-rodgers

 

Better now, Brady, and I may take him over Rodgers for one season.

 

 

To start a franchise, Rodgers, Luck, Rivers, Cam, in that order probably, Rivers is getting long in the tooth, but the dude can play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder why the media is not as obsessed about who the best player in the NBA is as it is in fall. hmm!

Oh, Eureka! They can't claim Ricky Rubio is the best.

It couldn't possibly be because the NBA only generates 60% of the revenue of the NFL (and 70% of MLB for that matter) or that the average 2014 NBA Championship series only had 1/3 the TV ratings of the friggin' NFL DRAFT, meaning that far fewer Americans are interested and/or emotionally invested in pro basketball. That couldn't be it at all.

Your schtick is so tired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder why the media is not as obsessed about who the best player in the NBA is as it is in fall. hmm!

 

Oh, Eureka! They can't claim Ricky Rubio is the best.

 

 

Err I hear them argue it all the time...? Between Lebro, Rose, Durant, Westbrook etc. Even more so with the GOAT between Jordan, Kobe, Lebron etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Gustavsson would be insane. I think we would have to break the bank to afford that move. Which, I don't think is necessarily a bad idea. Ultimately, Freddie isn't likely to be around more than a couple of seasons more. We can all agree that unless they have a fleet of sports psychologists working on Kochetkov, he will never be capable of getting his head on straight enough to compete.
    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
×
×
  • Create New...