Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Greg Hardy Could Receive A One Or Two-Game Suspension


NcPsa10

Recommended Posts

NFL is expected to have announce a statement regarding free agent DE Greg Hardy by Thursday.

 

Hardy is expected to receive either a one- or two-game suspension from the league for his involvement in a domestic violence incident that was eventually settled out of court.

 

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2393274-insider-buzz-nfl-will-suspend-fa-greg-hardy-unlikely-to-get-long-term-contract?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=web-mob-art-vid-16

Link to comment
Share on other sites

losing a top-3 DE hurts bad.

Bye bye Monsters Incorporated. please go somewhere out of conference.

i can only imagine all the fans that wanted to let you walk, just to come back and see you rip-shred through our line to get after Cam.

bet that would shut up the peanut gallery from questioning why we tried to keep you here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It wasn't "settled out of court," the charges were dropped because the witness stopped cooperating. Yes, obviously paid off, but the case could have been prosecuted without her if they actually had any evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have moved on

YeahcI seriously couldn't give two flying fugs about Hardy anymore. He was awesome on the field but got on my last damn nerves with his antics anyways. I moved on a long time and I'm surprised at all the people still slurping on his knob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...