Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Listen up! There are exactly two "safe" Panthers receivers.


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

There are exactly two "safe" Panthers receivers. And by safe, I am saying their roster spot is 100% certain. 

 

Kelvin Benjamin

Devin Funchess

 

 

Everyone else, and I do mean everyone, is trying out this year to make the team. Veterans, rookies, and everyone in between. 

 

That means 10 players will be trying to grab one of likely four roster spots. ( I see them keeping 6, not 7 considering special teams help was brought in at other positions)

 

Bersin

Boykin

Brown

Brown

Byrd

Cotchery 

Ginn

Hill 

Lucas

Presley

 

All of these guys have a fair shake at making the final cut, which will make for probably the best training camp competition out there this Summer. 

 

What more can you ask for? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't see how Ginn's not 100% for his returning because we didn't add anybody else with return ability. Still convinced Philly is a 100% lock but even if he's not I'm 100% sure he'll earn a spot in camp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't see how Ginn's not 100% for his returning because we didn't add anybody else with return ability. Still convinced Philly is a 100% lock but even if he's not I'm 100% sure he'll earn a spot in camp.

What if Byrd shows he can do returns?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure, some players are more likely to make the squad, like Ginn and Cotchery, but you cannot say with the same certainty that they will be here like you can with Kelvin and Devin 

 

 

Can we just call Kelvin and Devin.... Delvin ?

 

Funjamin?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What if Byrd shows he can do returns?

 

I'd still think Ginn would be basically locked in this year given his experience with returns.  I'm hoping the team has proven to themselves that a returner who is comfortable in their own skin back there is just as important as having a guy who has the physical tools to do it.  

 

On that same line of questioning though I'd sort of be surprised if Byrd doesn't stick if he shows that he is a functional returner and functional in the "run super fast in simple routes to pull the defense deep" receiving role.  I'm not hopeful that he does that, really, but if he can do both I think we'll see him on the roster at the end of the WR depth chart.

 

There are a ton of guys on that list but remarkably few outside of the last two draft picks who make me sit up and go "crap I'd hate to see him go" so I'm not sure it's out of the realm of possibility for both Ginn and [any other really fast receiver who has some return skills] to remain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well the entire intent of this is based on success of the pick based on the performance of the QB for an "expected" minimum return. I think that is where maybe I am not explaining what I am doing as well as I need to. The intent of all of this is to spit out a percentage of "success" for QB's picked in each round. The specific QB's are just lines of data in the spreadsheet that's feeding the minimums. So what I am attempting to do is build out/fine tune a reasonable set of minimums you would expect to see given the round drafted(cost, if you will). My logic is basically this: 1st Rounders Hall of Fame - No explanation needed. This was an all time great player. MVP/All Pro/Pro Bowl - Achievement that even if only happened once, this was a worthy investment. The player was able to reach near or league best play, even if briefly.  IMO, using just one as a threshold is fair. Even though it might only happen once, they reached their potential. This also filters out some other elements like injury shortened careers. Guys like Andrew Luck and RGIII pass as "successful" without being filtered out by the next minimum. 8+ Years as a Starter: This is a bit more debateable but I have included it as a function to catch some guys that might be a "soft success." The logic here being that perhaps a lengthy NFL starting career is "good enough" to be a success. Much more so than a failure. A drafted QB that was able to be a long term NFL starter is very desired, even if elite status was not ever truly reached. The only example of this that DOESN'T include some previously listed accolades in the almost 300 data points is.....Joe Flacco. And I think anyone at this point would have a hard time arguing that he was not a successful 1st round pick.   I am just gonna explain the first round logic but the rest of the rounds are similar. If you achieve any of these things, I would consider you a "success." Perhaps that will make it my thought process more clear.   Once again, very grateful to have all the debates and input on this. I do want to make this a meaningful thing I can keep updating.
    • we win...  i have nothing to lose and everything to gain with this prediction
    • The Egg shell peen was keeping the huddle open the whole time
×
×
  • Create New...