Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brenton Bersin continues to impress


Jeremy Igo
 Share

Recommended Posts

I could see Bersin getting the nod over Cotchery. First of all, like mentioned before, they are similiar players. Also, Funch doesn't seem to need much help. Ricky gave him very high praise in a recent article for being very smart, and having the ability to pick up things quickly. Honestly, I didn't think Bersin was going to make it. I thought Boykin would push him out because of his special teams ability. However, from what I have heard on here, Boykin hasn't impressed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If cam trusts him and has something of a rapport with him then well...

​he's been sucking up good receiver's air since cam got there. he should have some chemistry with him.  If we have no other option, then I guess we have no other choice. I'd give one of the youger guys a chance to produce. he'll barely see the field anyway

Edited by ncmonzta
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no problem with them keeping Bersin, I actually liked him at the beginning of last year and had high hopes for him.

 

i do have a problem with him ever being the 1st or 2nd option on any kind of crucial down, and I don't trust this coachin staff enough to not do that again.

​With the addition of Funchess, and Ginn, I don't think we should have to worry about this.

I like Bersin, he's a complimentary player, and he should contribute just fine here as such.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People forget he was actually a promising receiver because of that one play, AS A PUNT RETURNER, against Arizona.  With Ginn back he shouldn't have to do that anymore.  Still he's fighting for a roster spot again this year - and if he doesn't get one he'll definitely get picked up on another NFL team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no problem cheering for the young man. On third down, he is clutch. Gotta have someone that can do that. 

Can't always rely on the top talent. Can't force the football to the big guys all the time. 

I even have mo problem with him being the first read again.  With the other talent that will be out on the field, he could end up being ignored. 

 

The hate for him is off the charts. Hope you same pricks don't choke when your cheering on his catches this season. 

Karma is a bitch.

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...