Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Olsen not worried about the offense and redzone


panthers55

Recommended Posts

A lot has been made about how the offense is struggling and for example they have struggled in the red zone. Olsen helps put this in perspective and said essentially what I said a few days ago.  This was just the first install of the redzone offense and there is no game planning at all. As he correctly points out, redzone offense is heavily situational  and changes from week to week.  There is way too much chicken little posting for the 5th day off training camp when they have had little work in pads, IMO.  And yes if they are struggling in week 5 then it is a serious issue.  But that still doesn't make the complainers correct  it simply means we didn't improve from training camp to the regular season.

 

"It was our first of install for red zone," Olsen said. "Red zone is such a week-by-week specific part of the game. It’s so game-plan oriented. You are going to have days where it just doesn’t match up. That’s something that sometimes comes with early camp installations (where there isn’t any game-planning). And when you are playing against a good defense, it’s hard enough. But we’ll be fine."

 

http://www.panthers.com/news/article-2/Five-practice-observations-Day-5/2072bedb-c1d8-44fa-a9fc-2f0e89fab677

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The offense rest on Oherr and the Left Tackle position.  That's whether red zone or not.

No it doesnt.  One player even the left tackle is not the reason we will struggle or not.  we can gameplan to help out whoever plays that position and likely run more to the right side which is typically where you have your big maulers anyway.  As for passing in the redzone, those plays are typically quick hitters, lobs and screens anyway so an offensive guy doesnt have to hold off defenders for more than 3 seconds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't and won't trust the offense in the red zone until something gives...cough cough Shula.

We have the talent, and hopefully adding some more pieces will help execution.  But play-calling was mind-numbing for much of last year, which helped Gano's numbers, but not a lot else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hear Greg, and I want to believe him, but our team has been pretty poor at converting from the red zone for a while now.

 

Yeah that happens when you don't have good personnel at many spots.  The redzone just magnifies the issues since the defense can pack it in and you have less room to operate.  The problem has been the offense in general.  With the new additions and continued experience I think it will be different this year and going forward as we no longer have the worst offense in the league which is what was universally said about us last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few thoughts on the offense.

We turned over half our starters on offense between the start of the 2013 season and the start of 2014.  Then during 2014, we turned over the offense some more, with 4 more new starters playing by the end of the season. Four of these new 2014 starters were rookies, and several others (Cotchery, Avant, Remmers) all were new to the Panthers..   We only have 4-5 starters on Offense who were starters or EVEN ON THE TEAM back in 2013.  Cam, Olsen, Kalil & Tolbert.  (Also Stewart sort of counts, though DWill was the listed starter.)

By contrast, for 2015, we'll be likely be starting 10 - 11 returning starters on offense, with only Oher and Funchess being the likely new guys at this point. (I think D. Williams will eventually start, but perhaps not right away.)

I think this continuity will be a factor in a significantly improved offense.  At this point, it's just my wishful thinking, but I hope I'm right.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...