Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why does our play action pass suck so bad?


AceBoogie

Recommended Posts

I'm just simply looking for answers here. I'm not talking about Cam's read option fake when he pulls it back to pass, I'm talking about traditional play action pass. Its not even a fake, Cam just kind of nods to the running back. It's something that I always thought would improve, but never has. Anyone want to enlighten me?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats been a bit of a mystery to me too.

Its not that hes bad at it, its that he just doesnt even do it.  He does normal PA like he does the Read option PA. 2 hands on the ball and he pretends to fake, no he thinks about it, no he pretends to think about the fake....

i need to sit down...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Three reasons IMO

1.  Our traditional generally is weak.  Play action works in this scenario when you have the opponent concerned about your rush attack.  We generally have to get in shotgun/zone looks for our run to open up.  So we run for 1-2 yards and then suddenly think going play action is going to set something up

2.  Cam doesn't sell it well.  There actually is an awesome clip on Peyton and the effort time he puts into it.  I'm sure it is on you tube....his real handoff vs play action are virtually identical.

3.  I simply think Cam doesn't like those traditional power runs....b/c they don't work in terms of running and the play action of those clustered power run formations is kinda a weak idea given you aren't threatening with the rush.  So for example, on a play action that isn't going to generate much...is it worth selling it out fully if it meant turning his back to defenses allowing for Byron Bell to protected him blindly....I think Cam is most worried about getting hurt in those scenarios.

Cam sells the heck out of a zone read play action pass/run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While a QB really selling a handoff doesn't hurt, defenses are reading their keys to determine run/pass.  For the front 7, they're typically keying on a certain lineman or on a back, so that's where effective play action is sold. My guess is that comparing Carolina's OL vs other OLs on good play-action could be just as interesting as comparing QBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Three reasons IMO

1.  Our traditional generally is weak.  Play action works in this scenario when you have the opponent concerned about your rush attack.  We generally have to get in shotgun/zone looks for our run to open up.  So we run for 1-2 yards and then suddenly think going play action is going to set something up

2.  Cam doesn't sell it well.  There actually is an awesome clip on Peyton and the effort time he puts into it.  I'm sure it is on you tube....his real handoff vs play action are virtually identical.

3.  I simply think Cam doesn't like those traditional power runs....b/c they don't work in terms of running and the play action of those clustered power run formations is kinda a weak idea given you aren't threatening with the rush.  So for example, on a play action that isn't going to generate much...is it worth selling it out fully if it meant turning his back to defenses allowing for Byron Bell to protected him blindly....I think Cam is most worried about getting hurt in those scenarios.

Cam sells the heck out of a zone read play action pass/run.

I think the lack of a Oline that can really run block is the biggest problem but all this is true. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://nfltraderumors.co/2026-nfl-draft-grades-for-all-32-teams/      Grade: B+ Best Pick: Sam Hecht Biggest Reach (consensus rank): Jackson Kuwatch (NR) It's easy to love what Carolina did. The Panthers traded four times but ended the draft with the same number of selections that they started with and in approximately the same ranges. They did not take a player ahead of the consensus until Kuwatch at No. 227, and it's easy to see how he fell through the cracks playing at Miami of Ohio. He's a high-end athlete, though, and has a chance to develop, which is a fine profile for a seventh-rounder. Freeling and Brazzell also checked the high-end athleticism upside boxes for the Panthers. Carolina let the board come to them in the first round and could have a long-term solution at left tackle, which is a hard position to fill. Brazzell slid because of some maturity concerns as well as the difficulty in projecting receivers from Tennessee's Mickey Mouse offense. At 6-4, 200 pounds and 4.37 in the 40, though, the upside is undeniable. On top of that, the landed three starters on Day 3. Normally that's a high and unrealistic bar, but Hecht and Wheatley were both firmly inside the top 100 on the consensus board and have paths to win starting competitions. Lee fits the scheme well and has some interesting traits as an outside corner. What stopped me from a full-out A grade is not loving the Hunter pick, though he does fill a need to replace DT A'Shawn Robinson. There were prospects at other needs positions I would have been more jazzed about. The Brazzell pick is also an interesting risk for a team that's still in building mode, even coming off an NFC South title. Still, I'm nitpicking
    • I was just a teenager when I joined in 2013. I've loved the many opinions on this forum, even though several are infuriating. I've had several bad takes, myself,  that I've hopefully grown out of over the years.
×
×
  • Create New...