Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why does our play action pass suck so bad?


AceBoogie

Recommended Posts

I'm just simply looking for answers here. I'm not talking about Cam's read option fake when he pulls it back to pass, I'm talking about traditional play action pass. Its not even a fake, Cam just kind of nods to the running back. It's something that I always thought would improve, but never has. Anyone want to enlighten me?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats been a bit of a mystery to me too.

Its not that hes bad at it, its that he just doesnt even do it.  He does normal PA like he does the Read option PA. 2 hands on the ball and he pretends to fake, no he thinks about it, no he pretends to think about the fake....

i need to sit down...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Three reasons IMO

1.  Our traditional generally is weak.  Play action works in this scenario when you have the opponent concerned about your rush attack.  We generally have to get in shotgun/zone looks for our run to open up.  So we run for 1-2 yards and then suddenly think going play action is going to set something up

2.  Cam doesn't sell it well.  There actually is an awesome clip on Peyton and the effort time he puts into it.  I'm sure it is on you tube....his real handoff vs play action are virtually identical.

3.  I simply think Cam doesn't like those traditional power runs....b/c they don't work in terms of running and the play action of those clustered power run formations is kinda a weak idea given you aren't threatening with the rush.  So for example, on a play action that isn't going to generate much...is it worth selling it out fully if it meant turning his back to defenses allowing for Byron Bell to protected him blindly....I think Cam is most worried about getting hurt in those scenarios.

Cam sells the heck out of a zone read play action pass/run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While a QB really selling a handoff doesn't hurt, defenses are reading their keys to determine run/pass.  For the front 7, they're typically keying on a certain lineman or on a back, so that's where effective play action is sold. My guess is that comparing Carolina's OL vs other OLs on good play-action could be just as interesting as comparing QBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Three reasons IMO

1.  Our traditional generally is weak.  Play action works in this scenario when you have the opponent concerned about your rush attack.  We generally have to get in shotgun/zone looks for our run to open up.  So we run for 1-2 yards and then suddenly think going play action is going to set something up

2.  Cam doesn't sell it well.  There actually is an awesome clip on Peyton and the effort time he puts into it.  I'm sure it is on you tube....his real handoff vs play action are virtually identical.

3.  I simply think Cam doesn't like those traditional power runs....b/c they don't work in terms of running and the play action of those clustered power run formations is kinda a weak idea given you aren't threatening with the rush.  So for example, on a play action that isn't going to generate much...is it worth selling it out fully if it meant turning his back to defenses allowing for Byron Bell to protected him blindly....I think Cam is most worried about getting hurt in those scenarios.

Cam sells the heck out of a zone read play action pass/run.

I think the lack of a Oline that can really run block is the biggest problem but all this is true. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Maybe a bit of a homer take but I can't give us a grade lower than A.   Freeling was arguably the best LT prospect in the draft.  His athletic ability is off the chart and at 6'7" that can move.  It was a no brainer pick.   Hunter's key word is Violence. Putting him next to Brown should scare an offensive coordinator. These two give Scourton and Phillips plenty of chances to get one on one opportunities. Brazzell, another tall receiver with sprinter speed.  Our WR room is filled with tall talented WR.  Brazzell is going to give us a WR that can take to roof off the defense.  Basically Jimmy Horn with size. W. Lee III has a nickname of the Blanket. (heard this on the Beleav podcast with J. Stewart)  What a great name.  A great value in the 5th round. Hecht A strong, fast and extremely smart center. Many had him listed as the best center in the draft.  He's most likely a starter sooner than later. Wheatley A good safety in round 5.  Someone who could see playing time.   Kuwatch  I love this pick.  At minimum he will be a key piece on special teams and with some good coaching he'll see some packages where he'll play.  His down piece is he doesn't stay up in the running game.  Good coaching will fix this.  He reminds me a bit of A.J. Klein.   All these picks were great value.  I believe everyone of them were graded higher than the pick we took them.   Dan Morgan is IMO doing a great job turning this team into a good team with great depth.
    • Moton is a class act.  
    • Sure, that is possible. That’s what, an extra 55 yards a game on average and 7 more TDs? What if he’s just 15th?  I imagine they would extend him in that situation due to the belief that he’ll keep trending up. maybe a 3 year contract to prove he can be top 10? Sounds like a Tepper plan.
×
×
  • Create New...