Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So IF TD is out, and Luke is out, we should still expect to win, right?


nctarheel0619

Recommended Posts

I mean, it's the Tampa Bay Bucs.  Granted we made McKown look like an All-Pro but damn.  I would hope we would still win, they let Alfred Blue run for 139 yards on them with that plastered Texans line.  Jameis and that offense only got 9 total points against the damn Texans.  Just saying.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would expect Klein and Shaq to have big games then.   As previously discussed in all-pro, we would likely use more buffalo nickle package with a safety playing the slash roll.  This formation would leave us vulnerable to the run, but practically unstoppable against the pass.  If we would be able to get any kind of lead, this wouldn't prove to be an issue.  However, if we fall behind by 10 points like was did last week, we would have a hard time keeping the Bucs from running the clock and controlling the game.  

 

However, none of this likely matters because there is no indication that TD will miss the game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen the Bucs rise to the occasion against us more than any other team so nothing would surprise me. There's been years where they've been straight butt and still manage a nailbiter. No gimmes in divisional matchups. Even in our crippled state we're certainly the better squad though.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We sure are a paranoid bunch around here this week. 

My theory is that there isn't a lot of confidence in our 3-0 record, and there must be a belief that we're on the razors edge of being 0-3.

Our pass rush has been mostly nonexistent, but look at the brightside, we have a shutdown corner and tremendous pass blocking.  Cam is staying upright and imagine that, his passes are on target. 

We should always expect to win, never expect to lose. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...